Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
东北整活天团
也没有讨厌的硬捧女星
无脑观影佳片。 有几处笑料还是不错的
2022047，现在俨然已经形成东北宇宙了，但过度消费东北文化并不是一件长远的事情。还是有很多笑点的，只是剧本嘛…没办法小成本制作。抖音网红出演电影感觉是未来的小方向
不是一般好笑，几乎憋不住快笑出声。又假又糙，后期配音的台词不光对不上口型连时间都对不上了。有些镜头是拿半残dv拍的吧，镜头调度调到焦都糊了也是牛哇。还有不得不夸一下，这个批发的搞笑弱鸡枪声和人物频频随便牺牲几乎是学到了抗日神剧的精髓。另外，给只剩半截的鞭子配上后期鞭打声该说是行为艺术还是间离效果？
小电影挺有趣，想讲人生，也想讲歧视，还想讽刺社会现实，而且各个点都挖掘得不错。东北本土文化和意大利风情也融合在一起，最后的彩蛋也很巧思，佳佳有俩下子！前半段的包袱略显老套，同时佳佳太胖了，真的会影响观影效果，减减肥吧导演！
为了几个片段看完整部电影，还行吧，一部充满迷影情节的网大。
六七分的样子 反转基本猜都猜出来了 别叫宋晓峰演傻子好吗 实在是太像了 是真傻 彩票剧情有点老套
龙姨一颗星，致敬《当年情》一颗星，致敬《古惑仔》一颗星，所有的包袱和铺垫一颗星。
作为一部网络大电影我可以给4星，个人评分在70-75之间。网络电影的镜头非常有质感，能看出导演的诚意，笑点非常接东北地气。对刑满释放人员不要抱有偏见，刀爷演技真好啊。
8分，不尴尬的喜剧值得鼓励，全程没快进，二手玫瑰加0.5
到后二十分钟之前，能打4星，后面的剧情有点多余
这么些熟脸，容易碰撞出笑点，但是更容易跑题、分散主题，但是力道恰当，整体看下来比较舒服又出彩。
豆瓣6.3，但有锁分嫌疑，不推荐观看
“每个人都有面孔”，但每个人的面孔都被冰冷的暗色调、层次缺失的低照度摄影、复杂低效的长镜头调度（aka“导演的美学追求”）压得消失不见，本质上与常规主旋律没差。
故事也没交代明白，刀爷打的他爹？这年龄也对不上啊
但是逻辑不通
这片要是美国人拍的，估计能得8分。
前一小半不错还以为能一直黑色幽默，后面改正剧了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
