Synopsis
"Falsely accused as the murderer of my own husband... Oh, the cruel machinations of fate!" A female teacher (Lee Yong-ae) gives shelter to an escaped convict, but her husband, misconstruing her intentions, reacts violently and accidentally stabs himself to death in the process. The teacher is charged with her husband's murder, but fortunately the prosecutor on the case is a former student of hers, of whom she had taken painstaking care when she was working at an elementary school. Remembering her kindness to him, the prosecutor uncovers her innocence in court, and she is acquitted of the crime.
Notes
"A silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha)
A Public Prosecutor and a Teacher is familiar to us for the performance of Shin Chool, Korea's last silent movie narrator (known as "byeonsa"in Korean). Numerous critics have recommended the film, praising it as "a silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha), "the work of Korea's last silent movie narrator" (Kim Hong-joon), a movie that "reflects the public's consciousness and has great historical value" (Lee Seung-hun), and "the archetypal new-school film" (Chung Sung-il). As evidenced by such commentary, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherenjoys greater recognition for its historical value as the only surviving silent movie in Korea than for its artistic or technical aspects. What is ironic is the fact that this recognition derivesfrom a production and screening method that fell behind the times, as sound films (or "talkies") had already become the norm when the movie was first made. Its inclusion in the list is therefore based on its historical, social context rather than on the film itself.
Afterword:
- Narrated by Shin Chool, who is known as Korea's last silent film narrator, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherhas been screened at several film festivals since the latter half of the 1990s.
印度电影的走向是“史诗化”了吗？或者是法庭类型片？
太牛了，电影前半段一直在讲女教师的事情，我以为仅仅就围绕女性遭遇这一个话题来说了。一直到法庭戏开始，反转又反转，牵扯出政治阴谋、教育体制哲学问题，真的很好看
今年的印度高分电影好多。
神逆转！印度片实在是太敢说啦！不过也有小缺憾 比如音乐mv安插的有点尴尬 有些台词表达的范围太宽泛影响主题 有点飘忽 另外就是 真的太长啦 直到4分之3才绕回了“宿敌”这个概念 前面那2小时合着是超长铺垫啊
7.5分吧，败笔的bgm 太太太糟糕了，围绕着种姓制度下媒体审判的程序正义与结果正义，本质还是权力与权利之争，那种「狂热的正义」有些国家的人本应更有感触，但我知道它们会说什么话语。Win-Win🤮
“你看过扫地的那个人吗 以后他的女儿也会和他一样 干着这份工作 ，你想博士毕业 这不是你应该有的权利”“所以媒体是报道真相的，还是媒体报道的就是真相”
印度文艺工作者的尺度和表达程度我们已经望尘莫及了。但这部电影本身我可真喜欢不起来。
这故事架构能力甩我们太多了
为了争权夺利，这些政治家什么肮脏的事都做了。
总体还是挺不错的，后半段还挺紧张的，但是前面真的剧情节奏有些慢。
越来越像我未来男朋友了呢 （不敢相信我如此厚脸皮 哈哈 好吧 反正没人看见）
三个小时的电影十足漫长，随时来的歌舞声也不非常下头，也没什么高超手法，部分情节有点过于小学生，虽然…但是…友邻评论的人们共情的共的都是电影之外的东西特别贴切。
中国电影不仅在剧本讲故事的能力上，更在国家社会议题的反思和讨论上，离韩日以及印度电影差的越来越远了
电影让世界更美好。这片子太屌了，五星起步。
赋予罪犯的人权是否赋予受害者？那罪犯又是否是真正的罪犯还是舆论造就的有罪者？以疯狂的公众情感推动执行的即时正义，使真相更加模糊。掌声到攻击，敬他到恨他，其实又有何差？谁曾真正过问探寻事实呢？虚伪的正义伸张，破灭的真相难还原。失去理智的信徒，是罪恶最大的帮凶。印度电影真勇啊，法庭上的质问和最爱的《辩护人》有的一拼。这是继《杰伊•比姆》之后的另一次震动。
“在良心面前 没有少数服从多数的法则”
-彼时彼刻？-恰如此时此刻。-竟能如此相像？-像，太像了，不过你比他缺了一样东西。-不会是脸上的麻子吧？-当然不是，【你不会装糊涂】
电影不错，但是短评里一顿疯狂赞扬印度制度的，不知道为啥不移民去印度，按说就算当不了高种姓，应该也不至于沦为贱民，“至少那个国家的人民有尊严”嘛
真正难的是起树疙瘩，当你把地面挖开，那张复杂的脉络才显露出冰山一角来。你觉得树根在地下可能只有半米见方大小，但无数条树根可能已经延伸到数米远的地下，跟土壤紧紧得结合在一起。
7.5分吧，败笔的bgm 太太太糟糕了，围绕着种姓制度下媒体审判的程序正义与结果正义，本质还是权力与权利之争，那种「狂热的正义」有些国家的人本应更有感触，但我知道它们会说什么话语。Win-Win🤮
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
