Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
抛开硬性商业标准的槽点复线其实主线故事挺好，典型九十年代科幻味，对于月球内部的理论猜想算是有部影像展现。看得挺开心，很喜欢结尾，爱月球那就让你成为月球一部分🌕。
Bug很多，想法也很老土，大杂燴亂炖：從阿諾《終結者》就開始的電子叛变导致的世界毁灭，連虫子怪形象也是抄了《寂静之地》（ A Quiet Place），不过，不妨碍我看得津津有味。了解了洛希极限、潮汐鎖定，看到了戴森球（片中是人類前文明時的一個环）⋯⋯科幻片再爛，也總能帶給我一點新東東。
1.5 Childish kids playing with CGI toys. At least they are not stupid enough to blow up the new World Trade Center. Seriously they should have stopped him ten years ago . Who let him do it again? Oh Chinese money. Fine, don’t look up and keep your head down.
2022年，还能在大荧幕上看到罗兰·艾默里奇的正宗灾难片，要啥自行车，加一星。戴森球与阴谋论科学家也算推陈出新。如果不点明“外星人”的身份就好了，就当他们是《普罗米修斯》中的工程师。2020年新冠疫情后所有好莱坞个人英雄主义电影自动降2星，老头子没变，是观众变了。
《Moon Fall》我可以说，中美合拍片，就不可能拍出好的片子吗？如果再把这个范围设定得再小一些，应该会成立，就是所谓的商业电影，主流大片，因为文化的冲突在这里摆着，中国人如果是投资的大头，那更是灾害级别的
月球和戴森球出来时候的几个画面还蛮好看的，但是这种巨物我之前在网上看太多了，已经没什么新鲜的了。一个科幻电影，没一点观众觉得新鲜的画面，也是不及格的吧。更别提逻辑和节奏了，好几个角色都无所谓有没有，都是工具人。
看着豆瓣这么低的打分真想给五星补偿一下，真是不识货啊。不说别的，迈克尔贝的节奏感把控始终在线，一百一十分钟高强度紧抓住观众注意力，现在有几个导演能做到？那些给低分的你回头看看自己给四星五星的电影观看过程中，有多少次摸了手机？吉伦哈尔表现优异，把一个挣扎坚持矛盾的悍匪，演得入骨三分，真值得一个奖像。
把你看过的所有阴谋论结合到一起，拍一个合集，就是这部影片了。灾难片的灾难尺度是要有一个上限的，当月球坠落+外星人攻击宇航员+AI叛变+人类起源：异形普罗米修斯+大海啸+陨石坠落+核弹危机一起发生的时候，灾难就变成扯淡了……月球都撞上大西洋了，英国应该都被海啸灭了，将军们还担心核弹辐射影响人类健康呢。反过来说，美国发射几颗核弹就能把月球炸碎，也是扯淡。地球大气层都破了……还能恢复……肯定是奇异博士的功劳！
本来想看灾难片，结果变成了外星科幻片，我真是哭笑不得😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
如果说 《Don't Look Up》是一本正经地胡说八道，看似设定类似的本篇就是假正经说了太多遍自己都信了。模式化的角色和情节科幻，敷衍跑马灯式的套模板看多了当然有点不耐烦。不过最后居然连戴森球都搞出来了玩这么大确实没想到
感觉爆炸贝没有发挥好。全片的爆破场景不够多。明显功力没有发挥到最大值~所以影片的个人印迹就偏弱了。吉伦哈尔挑战大反派。表演用力，但又似乎发力不足。那种丧心病狂的劫匪范儿没有演绎到位。男二的黑人存在感也不足，演了半天也很难让人记住。过分追求警车和救护车的追逐戏，导致剧情合理性较差。
听出来了，是Leonerd的妈妈。华谊和腾讯这是打算花钱让好莱坞拍迎合中国的片子骗票房？目的太明显太露骨导致失效。资本主义的末日把戏黔驴技穷的感觉，资本主义最后挣扎是为房东们洗白。
这片应该叫圣母总动员，谁都是圣母什么都可以圣母，莫名其妙嘛。吉伦哈尔整的一帮啥乌合之众就抢银行？男二来借钱的直接就上车一起抢银行？抢都抢了怎么还同情这个同情那个，一笔雕凿。劫匪警察自动步枪打了半天愣是一个人都不倒，然后吉伦哈尔刚带好面罩换个镜头怎么又没了，救护车这么点大，FBI都上车检查了，怎么藏的了一个人加两个大背包钱的，全都是扯淡。。。
预期极低，意外还行，非常规灾难片，而是月球“阴谋论”，中间还剩40分钟时一度以为要脑洞大开，结果又止于AI哗变的老生常谈，剧情就好像在看星门某集AU：假设古人与replicators+纳米机器人大战失败后在不同星系留下了许多古人科技前哨站，而这个AU版里只留下了月球。不懂是不是要拍续集，地球部分滥俗，月球部分视效还是不错的。
所以，可以想象，一部由不会拍电影的人指手画脚的电影，将会是什么样一副画面
爆炸贝也不怎么炸了
太过时了。设定离奇，故事和人物套路，还玩类型混搭。
没那么差，毕竟灾难片大师，罗兰艾默里奇的节奏还是没得黑的，紧张刺激的临场感是那些三流货色做不出来的。灾难片和上世纪末科幻片的结合，就是故事细节经不起推敲，一个纯粹的爆米花，放松一下还是可以的，我怎么感觉现在豆瓣用户数爆炸了但是装逼程度更严重了
都2022年了，迈克尔贝还在拍摄抢银行的戏码，剧情毫无逻辑，唯一的创新就是花里胡俏的运镜
看之前真的没想到会这么难看，毫无新意的故事配上毫无心意的动作场面，辅以迈克尔贝一贯的尴尬笑料和环拍镜头，整部电影带给我的只有喧嚣。看简介以为有三方混战，剧情反转啥的，结果真就追了大概一个小时的车，而且是那种最普通的追车戏，你哪怕学学《生死时速》呢。搞笑的是台词里还cue了导演自己的《勇闯夺命岛》和《绝地战警》，也不知道导演自己会不会因为不复当年而尴尬。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
