Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
故事的设定在未来的某个时间段，随手可见的高科技产品，最令人惊叹的是克隆医疗技术，不过克隆人这一设定并不新鲜。影片中最为感触的一幕是克隆人与卡梅隆发生争执，二人又在顶峰相遇共同面向夕阳，除了衣着不同，如同照镜子般，两人的和解也说明了彼此内心的和解。喜欢影片中卡梅隆和杰克的最后一次交谈，导演将镜头偏向卡梅隆，没有继续采用对称镜头，从而暗示了卡梅隆的离世，杰克将正式代替他活下去，导演将无声的告别诠释的十分生动有力。
最后我会在自己的心里安息
好害怕反转成为人工智能鸠占鹊巢的阴谋论，但这是一首挽歌，一开场告别，被人遗忘的苦，接受不再是的唯一，但爱只是延续，不可替代。阿里演技太好了，潸然泪下。
男主和医生是近期喜爱的演员。后续展开算有说服力(非剧情，仅心理)虚拟屏质感和连线游戏好评！
解答了我对 2006年电影 The Prestige 的疑惑
导演也是编剧，牛！演员们的表演和拍摄剪辑也棒！
8.0既然你不想看妻子为你死亡而难过去做的克隆，那你确保克隆人不出问题以后，就干脆不要再出现。既然你放不下那就别去做克隆，告诉妻子身体快不行了，接受妻子为你伤心难过，快乐的和妻子儿子过好为数不多的时光。虽然犹豫，放不下是人类的通病，孰能无情，怎么可能保持理性。但是既然你做了这个决定就要接受这个决定带来的一切，不管好与不好全盘接受。反反复复这点很不舒服
另一种诠释死亡的视角，但生命和精神的延续到底应该沿用那种方式？不是人能控制的，尊崇自然法则吧。片尾如果博士的新顾客是女主那意义或许提升两个档次。
😅在戏剧性和肥皂剧之间还是回归了肥皂剧……
美其名曰新类型，不过就是换个方式给你讲大道理罢了。科幻外衣下的毒鸡汤真的也没有好喝。
我挚爱的一切
以为会喜欢，结果看了一半起来吃了两包饼干，一包鸡汤味，一包趣多多，我果然还是爱吃甜的，时间和胃容量都有限，就不要浪费空间了。
怎么港，3.5吧，不够深，但主题是我喜欢的，如果讨论更深点就好了。只是逻辑上连这么高超的克隆技术都有了，为什么连癌症的那个基因不能直接被编辑，不合理，而且还没安乐死要在那里等死？
如果妻子是克隆人，还能感受到一丝温情。苹果定制片，苹果设计理念大赏。
我猜Ntr都不愿意干这事...好多可以挖掘的深度和矛盾比如自我和存在这种都没没拍出来，临门差几脚。
像her一样寂寞 疏离 但也发着微微的光
当科技和医学，成为我们畏惧死亡的正当替代品，建立在谎言上的所谓爱，还能是真实的吗？
😅在戏剧性和肥皂剧之间还是回归了肥皂剧……
比起探讨伦理问题更多的是情感表达，男主演技好的离谱，把跟自己拥有相同记忆的克隆人和自己能演出区别来，那个没有经历过喜悦和伤痛的灵魂，怎么都是纯粹一些的
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
