A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
看的第一部洪常秀的片子……只能说，沉沦在金敏喜的侧颜里！
这样的吗。。幸福是梦幻，很值得吧。可以一起吗
反复出现三四次的“Help”Tittle，和配合这个Tittle出现的那两三秒过场画面，将影片的整体性生生割裂；唯一感受到的是，当这个Tittle出现，就代表片中的时间大跨步向前了，但想推进时间有很多种方式，这是最偷懒最糟糕的一种。
3. 每一次呼吸都伴随绝望，还有多少被掩盖的历史与现在是我们没有看到的呢。
疫情爆发期间UK养老院的缩写。导演出色。凌晨三点女主Sarah请男主Tony帮患者翻身那场重点戏，全程没有拍Sarah的脸，戏结束后才把镜头转到Sarah，这段处理的太好了。你为什么这么关心他？因为他是好人，而好人太稀有了。if i helped, that’d be nice.
前30分钟漫长虚伪的相遇、对话（除了导演借导演之口剖白部分），假惺惺不经意间满屏流动，对比日式常见的程序式客套，韩式客套有一种等聊完就相互背刺的惊悚感，好像在看恐怖片，可怕的“他者即地狱”！
他的电影倒是让我意识到对日常生活的专注力不够。其实平淡的生活 每一个当下都可以活得很诗意。
可我依然乐观
冲着金敏喜和洪尚秀看的。 对金敏喜感兴趣，纯粹是因为她的话题，什么男神收割机，什么和大22岁导演的不伦之恋，我在看她的《小姐》的时候甚至都不知道她，看的时候还觉得这小姐长得不够漂亮。其实我发现拍文艺片，尤其是大众看不明白的文艺片，是很容易让一个没什么姿色的女演员突然变得很有姿色，你觉得没有那是你没品味。说回这部电影，用手机拍摄就可以了，还说是剧情片，都不知道有什么剧情，还有就是不喜欢那个女作家，还有，完全不明白为啥现在有些电影要拍黑白片。文艺真是一个特殊的存在，你不懂是因为你只是一个俗人。
ou确实是无法分清开头更好还是结尾更好的电影啊！还是结尾更好吧！像蝴蝶一样的电影，扑腾的翅膀经过，只留下气味在空中。
B+比去年的两部看上去趣味性强了一些，维持住了水准，一体两面，怼导演那段个人看的真爽，哈哈哈
不满镜头的美感不够以及摄影的载体太过于刻意，看到最后发现洪根本不在意这点，而正是想表达忙于镜头下被拍摄的人和人之间真实的联系，偶遇、虚伪、亲密、友好聚会，拍电影和写小说背后的秘密是没人关心的，最后拍得成功与否也不是重要的，好像以上这些就是正是要表达的核。秀恩爱的满屏浪漫在击碎我的心，告诉大家“你们真的不重要，我有敏喜！”。
第一反应电影或许结尾在Jodie的那段“控诉”会更好，但回头一想可能导演有意在平衡愤怒的情绪。p.s.利物浦球迷看着心酸而又满足。
虽然知道洪导基本每部电影都在暗戳戳的隐喻自己，但这次是如此明晃晃的夹带私货，剖白给世人看，骂一些人，顺带展现一些情比金坚。
就像日常聊天，和朋友共度的日常一样，特别不电影的电影，所有的情绪都在每一句台词中间。洪尚秀的镜头下的金敏喜也太好看，尤其是最后捧着花束对着镜头互道“我爱你”，金敏喜眼神里有星星。
不太喜欢电影 但被洪常秀在摄影机背后的告白打动了
评分那么高我却完全无感。应该是剧本不行，啰嗦。看在主题好的面子上给三星。20分钟弃剧。
结尾女主对着镜头不断质问，在某些程度上，世界也差劲得如此大同。无法对抗病毒、无法对抗体制，有时候甚至连身边的人都无法拯救，绝望层层坠落，最终掉在每一个普通人得头上。又一部被片名耽误的好电影。
省钱达人导演。高产太多。虽然看起来有点省美疲劳了。但不得不承认，这就是疫情下，无投资的环境下，保持创作能力的最优办法呀。羡慕，敬佩。单纯献给拍摄与制作。至于影片内容本身，不是太感冒了，毕竟这内容表现中老年知识分子的困境，或者一种职业生活的状态。不太能够引起私人的共鸣。对白依然很多，翻译过来，理解也较为吃力。不知道为什么在柏林能拿到银熊奖。疫情下，世界电影作者的创作力，还是很疲乏和苍白了吧。
这才是疫情电影的正确打开方式！朱迪科默可以封神了！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
