6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful.
A brilliant and outragously funny satire of society, 7 December 1999
Author: Dave Joerg ([email protected])
"Flodder" is one of the funniest movies ever made and few people realise that it is a Dutch movie made by none other than the Holland version of John Carpenter, the famous Dick Maas, author and director of the thriller "Amsterdamned". The Flodder family is the reincarnation of the term a-social. When the whole family bunch, basically all bastards, criminals and sluts must be relocated from their City slum because of toxic waste under their house, the city council house no choice. The only available space is in the "Zoendal" - the "Sun Valley" the best area in Amsterdam where all doctors, snobs and businessmen can afford to live their lives. And where the central point of interest and politics is the tennis club of the community. The Flodder family brings devastation to the tranquil world that ruled before. They are simply unbelievable. The characterisation is incredibly funny, beginning with Ma Flodder who searches other people's trash cans for food or making illegal liquor in her cellar and ending with the eldest daughter who is the biggest slut on earth. Together they make the most horrible family imaginable, a sort of immoral mirror image to the Brady Bunch or the Waltons. When the City counsel of Amsterdam hoped that the Flodders would show their good will to be more civilised in their new area, it turns out that Holland's most famous family would rather bring out the worst in the rich people of "Sun Valley"-wonderland. The rest is a hilarious, brilliant and well made social satire that can be watched as a provocative movie as well as a straightforward comedy. Dick Maas at his best. I salute him! Flooder was the Dutch smash hit in 1986 and brought two sequels and a tv series. All of the sequels were nice but not as great as the original.
Flodders (1986) is available on DVD in Germany in a dubbed German version in Dolby Digital 5.1. under the name:
"Flodders -Eine Familie zum knutschen"
Why is First Floor Features, the producer of the movie not bringing the Dick Maas blockbusters out on DVD in the Netherlands, I wonder. The are not even available on video there. These movies have so much potential, still to this day and have a huge silent but true following.
妥了 新食材 新菜谱 我指的是内脏（bushi）
（票房惨淡口碑也一般，估计与颁奖季是无缘了…
本来是满心期待柯南伯格又会给影迷带来什么样的震撼人心的佳作。可是看完还是略显失望。主要是这次柯南伯格想要传达的关于“器官”这一概念性的命题实在有点模糊和虚幻。表达的意图偏抽象化，人物的行为举止偏意识流化，因此很难窥测其深意。倒是那对于身体切割的部分，会给人留下“难以忘却”的记忆，不过这也是柯南伯格一贯的视觉极端风格，看多了反而就不会那么渗人了。
A24的套路：一个传说，一个经典故事，搭配一些宗教的神神叨叨氛围。
Hear me ”
那块巧克力到底是窒息的食物还是未来的标志？
其实所有游牧民族 部落风情的电影 都是王子复仇记 狮子王 的故事大纲 only the scenes and the leads can make them outstanding unfortunately not this one. Anya looks beautiful but not viking enough.
话剧质感，卡司强大，风景原始，基本上是写实北欧那时候的野蛮残酷生活了，还有些神叨叨，树的画面美到窒息，残暴的画面也是极度舒适。剧情简单，不过，内容有血有肉。连着把北欧几个国家走完，我是真的不喜欢北欧，骨子里就野蛮没文化，如今也就是仍旧贫困的暴发户啊，挪威风景很美。看到最后发现是北欧版《王字复仇记》，真真大悲剧!安雅太好看了! 特效真的太美了，最后王子复仇了，还变成了神灵？
柯南伯格是真的对（被割裂的）人体有着近乎神圣的着迷，而平和稳定摄影则将这种美感与神圣准确传递给了观众（不管是否被接受）至于表达，不能说完全理解了，感受到了一丝现代科技与政治不太光鲜的链接，以及宿命论式的身体进化悲观论。柯南伯格（化身为影片中男主角）先是悲观，然后流着泪接受。
实不相瞒 觉得很好看！充满阳刚 野性 原始和神秘气息。晦涩又让人欲罢不能。这才叫电影 比隔壁那个妈的多元宇宙好看太多！艺术造诣高下立见啊！
“我们在地狱之门见”
这剧本也太莎士比亚了，用现在的眼光来看可谓是极其狗血，最后一幕也没看懂，怎么突然就来了一场暗影格斗。如果这部片子想传达的是自由的意志或者通过复仇而引发的种种思考，那显然统统没有做到。唯一的成功之处可能就是场景的构造，弄得非常像一部旅游纪录片，可是有的场景真是暗得惊人，我瞪大眼睛都看不清发生了什么。或许在大荧幕上面看会更好，小荧幕看这种片子比较吃亏。
看了几篇影评，还是觉得在讨论艺术的伦理边界，身体政治还是核心。可惜不懂赛博格。如果可以从装置艺术来看应该也会很有趣，观感还是很奇妙的
拍摄出色，灯光，构图，都有设计，大量的剪影拍摄，美术设计强。
就说说 还有哪一对好莱坞明星既演过夫妻又演过母子的？
看完有几个迷惑，第一个是这个片的成本为什么高达7000万？钱花哪里去了，看着还没有1000多万成本的绿衣骑士贵。第二是Eggers的灵气都去哪里了？前作里面大胆cult的元素和引人入胜的叙事都去哪里了，这个片里我看到的只是束手束脚和敷衍了事。PS，片长也有点太长，没有充沛的感情和充足的动机来支撑，显得片子又长又空洞。
这导演是个混子……根本不会拍，只不过在美国的制作环境下，混的更容易一些
都能看下去，可看到最后有点受不了跳了一下，结果就结束了。。。2.5
柯南伯格一直用“痛”延缓着人类欲望的消亡，《东方的承诺》中尼古拉裸身在浴室瓷砖地上不停地的摔打；《欲望号快车》中詹姆斯用身体“拥抱”着撞车的冲击与伤害；《变蝇人》中赛斯忍受身体分解成分子的极限痛楚。这一部《未来罪行》他想走得更远，然而他自己走了进去，却无论如何找不到出口。
四星半。最喜欢的《哈姆雷特》改编。完全剔除了莎翁戏剧的多愁善感。神话和写实水乳交融。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
