Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
抗美援朝我们在双方装备和补给悬殊巨大的情况下，靠着“小米➕步枪”，靠着志愿军的坚持，看着志愿军的生命赢得的。《狙击手》由小见大，展现出战争的残酷，立意很好。过分渲染甚至略显刻意的情感是主旋律电影最大的问题，该片也未能逃脱这个俗套。
情节编排基础好，即便剧本和视听有明显缺陷，成品也不会太差。比《红鳉鱼》好，只有展现出人物遇到的真正困难，回忆往昔才能有对比强烈的情感。现在还有几个艺人能做到不讨好主流，不讨好时代。柳乐优弥演得稍微有点过，希望他能再有一部主演的电影回到戛纳竞赛，我想最善于来事的戛纳不应该放过这个话题点。不懂就问，北野武九十年代才出车祸面瘫，柳乐优弥那么早就歪嘴的原因是？
过于流水平淡 过于温情脉脉 缺少了点电影感 像长篇晨间剧
（5）。带女儿拍戏是吧？主旋律电影的通病基本都整上，大量无能旁白加俗套煽情配乐。人物基本懒得塑造直接牺牲。开打第一个子弹扫射雪地的五毛特效就把我震惊了，直接梦回长津湖。
对狙的过程拍的非常出色，前后两段有点刻意。结尾的上甘岭很不错，旁边的老两口这里看的最认真
8/10,春节档最佳，国师近几部片子排片量好像都不咋地，同样是抗美援朝大前提，却以一个狙击班做切入点，以小见大。敌方难得的不降智，也不会主动的打小孩。剧情层层递进一气呵成。章宇真的棒。五班都很棒！小不足是bgm实在是铺的太多了。有时候感觉有点吵=-=结局真是让我有了一次全新的体验，就是你明明情绪上波动不是很大，但是你泪止不住的流。五班！到！！
与其说是个人发迹史，不如说是记录了一段师生情。没有预期中的个性张扬，甚至可以说是俗气的讲述方式，但够真挚动人。影帝这种眼神内置孩童式纯真温柔还略呆萌的气质多少会让人有点出戏，但强大自我如北野武也确实很难“演”出来吧，以独立故事来看其实演绎得很不错了，包括大泉洋老师！以及门胁麦可以说是漫才恋人专业户了，嗓音又那么好听……霓虹的漫才心酸史还真是总能拍得触动人心。
碰巧路过请客吃饭，就算红了也不会让你上，电视内裤角度，红色高跟鞋，已烧一半火葬场打折，“阿武怎么办？”……感觉柳乐优弥演得更像现在的北野武而不是以前的北野武，算是演员二次创作？挺感人
前半段：我擦？这张艺谋拍的？
确实是近些年看过最好的国产战争片了。就那么一个山坡发生的故事，惊心动魄。好几次剧情反套路，看得揪心。最后也真切感受了战争的残酷以及和平的不易。章宇和年轻演员们演的真好！
90分钟是舒适的观影时间。感人！张宇不错，
土屋摘了眼镜算是じゃない方里的顶级素人了。
前半段面部表情太刻意看的有点出戏了，1小时后逐渐发力 认真自然(厕所那场戏那个侧脸 瞬间跳戏到无人知晓了) 师徒情的部分非常踏实。不知道是影帝表演的太柔还是剧本过于主打温情 ，想象里这该是个麻辣鲜师对付臭脸酷小子的故事 大泉洋演这类角色还是挺稳的
最后大永独自对战John那段能再丰富些就好了，John安了假头盔诱敌，应该不会想不到对手也有策略吧
抗美援朝大背景下冷枪冷炮中的一次小战役，一个个勇敢付出牺牲的小战士，最后铸就了抗美援朝战争的最终胜利。不同于以往的大场面和熟悉面孔，电影采用真雪景和全新人担任主演，让人从不一样的角度更好地带入志愿军战士。
以小见大的故事，深深感受到当年战争的惨烈，有这样一部电影在贺岁档挺棒的，老谋子的出品很稳，章宇的表演很棒。
春节档最佳了应该是，对于大场面战争特效有点腻了，小规模小场面几个人也能体现战争的残酷，战场上哪有什么主角配角，可能刚开打一秒钟就死了。
门胁的哭戏是对火花里告别演出的callback。看到creepy nuts的时候，正好m1败者复活，真是巧。
震撼人心，荡气回肠，片尾曲响起无一观众离场，大师之作，值得一看
有点煽情啦 为北野武和主演们加一星 门胁麦的后半部分穿越到火花了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
