-
视频
视频
资讯
视频
资讯
Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
好困好乏味，宛如当时读北欧神话一样痛苦。王子复仇套路加上视觉色彩毫无创见的堆砌。打着惊悚片的旗号其实不仅不惊悚，所谓的神灵和巫师也没有突出的设计质感。
把Hamlet到莎士比亚时代已经层叠累积千年的基督教色彩全部剥去，还原成Amleth传说中原初的北欧气息。感觉第一署名编剧Sjón的贡献其实比导演大？作为类型化尝试不太成功，Eggers以后还是继续回A24拍文艺恐怖片吧！
画风依旧冷冽、暗黑和血腥，但已然没了前作的精致考究，史上最寒碜的王子复仇记，空有影像，毫无内涵。
经典的剧情，让我可以分配更多的精力沉浸在画面、音乐中。非常沉浸的观影体验。重复观看了“男主成年后划船出场那段长镜头，调度惊艳；最后一场火山熔岩的决斗，太美了，暴力美学！
6.5/10。好遗憾，虽然题材早已耳熟能详，但本该是沉重的人性史诗却被拍成了直白的复仇故事，失却主题应有之凝练，独特的符号设计和细腻的影像质感也成了徒具其表的空壳。
1.艾格斯确实是天才2.想被斯加斯加德橄榄 3.看完想找个人在火山口打一架
阿姆雷斯 质感不如库泽尔版麦克白和绿衣骑士
火山决斗喘气那段和我家猫吐毛球的声音一模一样
大概就是想拍史诗但总觉得哪里不够连贯，北欧神话也好，王子复仇也好，都不是那么陌生的内容，却依然感受不到景物之外的震撼，可能问题在于拍摄人物的方式，很努力是有啦，效果不够好
没啥劲，形式大于内容，憋足了劲的史诗风格，可惜内容单薄又撑不起，男主角色像个神棍：我背后有人，今天我不能死
很喜欢灯塔，但这个真的很无聊，有的景色本身挺美的，特效居然也很差，gameofthrone即视感真的强，不过看看预算也可以管中窥豹电影和电视剧，好莱坞这些年确实还挺懵逼的，电影最后会怎么样真的挺难说的。。应该要有全新的电影出现了
很傻的商业片模版海报，看起来却很意外，近期不错的影像片
仪式化电影。遍布的仪式化场景、构图、音乐、叙事、人物，仪式通往远古的巫术，以巫术（神话）为基础生产伦理文化，延续并巩固人类文明。因此，叙事必然是古典化的，如同祭祀，必须按照某种礼制，由此形成一个神话的述说。
艾格斯继续稳定发挥，影像风格比前两部作品更成熟。哈姆雷特的叙事底板，基本盘首先能保证，这次的亮点是通灵后的精神世界和北欧众神的设定巧妙融合起来，对于推进剧情和视觉构建，都产生了十分显著的效果。安雅还是美啊！
2022.5.13 卧槽。。4.15首映 5.13就上线？？居然12号提前流出了！！还可以吧 只可惜的是没看到安雅的裸露片段…明明都这么擦边了但还是就差那么一点点啊！但女主是真的好看啊。。之前看爱玛就感觉她贼好看 也别说什么北欧人野蛮 以前弱肉强食的世界确实是这样的。。片中还有威廉达福的骷髅 害怕 女主掀起下体那块不知道是啥 还有男女主打野战。。妈的擦边就差一点可以看到女主裸体了！？？？男主妈妈和男主接吻 乌鸦救了男主 什么鬼 ？？用马还有女人的生命来献祭他的儿子 卧槽 女主的裸体后背 怎么就没有前面呢？！本来可以逃掉的 但就是要复仇去杀他叔叔 杀了自己妈妈还有仇人的两个儿子后最后在地狱之门同归于尽
这么长，为什么不拍成美剧呢？没什么吸引力。
我有时候还认不清谁是主角
影像至上，文本稍逊，冗杂略长；虽然古典戏剧外加暴走的荷尔蒙，感觉上会很别扭，而且常规叙事和传统表达比较庸俗；但制作绝对走心，一板一眼无功无过，各要素搭配恰如其分，难得的良心佳片。
泰姆瑞尔人兼冰岛迷当然狂喜。风光大片。但是故事么...嗯...其实并没有忠实于原著，但又非常轴地一定要体现悲剧本色，就朗诵多过对白了
北欧版《王子復仇记》，神神叨叨，泥泞又昏暗。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
