A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
恰逢俄乌局势问题严峻，有一句话是共同的：干翻老美！
感觉水门桥的节奏感没有长津湖好。很燃很感动，这种片子其实总能看出一丝反战意味。
朋友来了有好酒，若是那豺狼来了 迎接它的有猎枪！
打得我看懵了，几次分不清敌我，结尾有点多余，叫那一声但吴京别出现最好了我不过去拍一次没完成的任务，也算有意义
我哥看电影之前剧透骗我说最后只死了一个人，我满怀期望看到最后👋🏻👋🏻
不说别的，至少没打起来前、两场战争中间过程中还是描述下当前情况之类的吧，现在看下来整部片子两个半小时，就是打仗死人，我连水门桥都没看清楚到底啥样，也没说有啥用，就知道了炸桥，失败了，继续上去炸。
这一部是在电影院看的 那么多人就剩一个伍万里是真的太惨了 最好哭的地方在朱亚文开车一路溜下去撞桥 还有坦克把人连带炸药包轧死 伍万里守着哥哥尸体不敢动 一直滑下去 才敢哭出来 太多细节了 还是那句话 勿忘历史 也勿忘国耻 好好生活 才不愧前人的浴血奋战创造的美好现在
有个槽点是没看懂伍万里最后一次进攻到底想干嘛，在管道扒拉，一个很坚毅的眼神镜头我以为要不顾障碍往里冲了，结果选择看戏。
即便看了再多抗美援朝的电影，还是会难受，因为没有制空权的新中国凭借着中国人民的强大意志打碎美帝国主义妄想付出的沉重代价。战士们向着日出说是祖国的方向，新中国万岁的时候眼泪真的会掉下来。付出生命炸桥，对方分分钟又修好了，可只要桥还在，任务就还在。直到最后，七连实到1人，我真的哭死。
仿佛整部剧就注意了战争场面惨烈，烈士英勇，不需要叙事。
看完上部，我就说还可以再拍3个小时，这不就是了！但虽然是高潮部分，反而没有上部那么有层次了，文戏有故意喊solgan的嫌疑，讲悲壮，讲惨烈，讲中美当时的差距倒是很到位，战争的残酷和无奈也第一次有所触碰，不太喜欢这样这头没讲完就讲那头的节奏，眼花缭乱的剪辑有些无所适从，但或许这就是亲历者的感受，观众失去上帝视角反而彻底沉浸式体验了。
没看到什么亮点 整体还不如第一部 作为政治主旋律影片 片尾超长的名单 再次让人感受到了电影是一个工业和政治宣传机器的事实
真理，只在大炮射程之内。
第一部就被渲染的很多情景震撼，并且第二部以作战行动为主，未再说明为什么这一战非打不可，因此看第二部时，说实话并没有多么因那些宏大壮丽的流血牺牲片段热血沸腾，多么有自豪骄傲扬眉吐气之感，而是本能地感到沮丧，甚至凄凉和悲哀。在任何宏大叙事前，个人都是渺小的，尽管每个人都是有自己故事线的个体，无论是作战的哪一方，却仍然都逃不开成为“不惜一切代价”的那个代价。再联想到一些时事，忍不住“不正确”地想：真的有什么战争是必须要进行且避无可避的吗。
和她一起看的第六十八部电影。时隔两年后一起走进老家电影院，电影承袭上一部的品质，并且更能体现徐克的风格，唯一遗憾的是在电影开始小吴没能在娃娃机里抓到一个娃娃。
万里能活着，是因为大年初一。唉，战争残酷到难以面对和承受
大场景大制作，不过相对于第一部来说，好像感人片段少了一点。 感觉狙击手更好看一些诶，可能因为人员少一些，描述也会更仔细一些。
纵观全片，好像只有朱亚文有一点战争之外的故事。如果其他人也可以表现一点他们身为“人”的故事，应该能让人物更立体一点。
节奏比第一部要好太多了 没有一点冷场，从头打到尾 徐克风格体现淋漓尽致，太压抑了，比第一部压抑太多 真的不适合过年看，最后的第七穿插连实到一人真的是个中国人都要破防，给伟大的志愿军战士致敬
如果两部电影删去尴尬与槽点剪成一部时长长些的片或许会好很多
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
