Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
英伦男主很帅，角色跟他没有一点点的貌合神离。但不得不说，希特勒的角色没选好，当时的希特勒怎么就是个老头子啦？！！
电影很多内容，在当今也有意义，一面是保守主义，一面是激进的思想。你如果走中间，也就是阻止这两派，必然会遇到很大的阻碍。在这一过程中，必须要找到一种相对平衡，否则局势会失控。
主角光环，开挂战斗。好久没看这么长的电影了，3个小时。赤手空拳，单挑老虎。老虎做的太真啦，合成也很棒。男主身材太好了，全是肌肉呀，力量超强。这哪是警察呀，这是战神吧！种族歧视，反抗斗争。吃饭不要用左手。
一个泪眼朦胧之中放手扬鞭，说：“你还不快给老子跪下”；
这比当今一大片好莱坞大片有着更强的娱乐性和更纯粹的cinema体验
1.handsome guys
政治就像打牌，我只能尽量利用好手中的牌。两人共抽一支烟，看向对方一同吐出一口浊气，最后诠释山雨欲来风满楼。
印度大爽片。整体看下来，我觉得倒更像是表现兄弟情的主旨，推翻入侵者统治只是复线任务。他想为部落带回小女孩，我抛弃大业帮你完成。你想为村庄带回枪支，我不顾性命帮你实现。
学生时代关于张伯伦的对应词就是绥靖，后来看丘吉尔自传，张伯伦并不是一无是处。这部片子从另一个角度展现了那段历史和相关当事人，蛮有意思…
载歌载舞，3个小时。打戏慢镜头。知道我看的多尬吗？还有玛利亚是干啥子被看中了？搞不懂。脸盲一直分不清谁是谁
俄罗斯已经在基辅兵临城下！！张伯伦在希特勒面前简直幼稚地像一个幼稚园小朋友。人总是有局限性的 历史也总是在重复。在张伯伦的视角里 他一次又一次地 为了保持和平而付出努力 殊不知 却是在饲养一个人间恶魔
头可断，血可流，发型不能乱。本片三大特点：耍帅、耍帅、还是耍帅。逻辑性？不存在的。合理性？不需要的。
影片情节还是紧张的，不是谍战胜似谍战。
However, this is where we are now
？这个观点洗白张伯伦是没想到的，或许慕尼黑协定为带英带来的好处就是日后小胡子念在绥靖时的带英好感没一棒子打死。这么看来也是一步棋啊，哈哈哈哈
一个鲜血横流之时放声高歌，说：“老子宁折不弯”。
二战前的紧张局势，此时战争一触即发。现在我们看希特勒，绝对是罪人，毫无疑问。但是二战前的德国，支持希特勒的人有很多人，当时德国失业率高，人民生活一般，有这么一个强人承诺让德国人过上好日子，所有人就跟随了，也不考虑是通过何种方式让自己过上好日子的。剧中希特勒这个演员有点差劲，没演出元首的气势。而张伯伦这个演员不错，后来一查果然是老戏骨。
理想与现实的碰撞，妥协对英国是优解，对世界不是
大家理解水平各不相同
不要有希望，因为希望是需要靠别人来实现的……拍的太戏剧化了，设置的压迫感还不够……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
