Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
主题推进得非常缓慢，甚至快到中段之前会怀疑这种不知是否可以算作清教徒式的苦行生活对赎罪有何用处，只能说生活上的一点克制和精神上的每日自省在一遍遍洗刷过往PTSD带来的烙印，但随着超广角的监狱酷刑展示，加害者的原罪在迷幻中被揭开，牌桌上的推演计算是精神上的麻醉剂吗？爱可以救赎过往的罪孽吗？信仰早已幻灭，刑具则是所身处的真相，加害者原来也是受害者，最后只能通过刑罚受戒得到解脱。还是有些简陋，爱情线没有那么必要。
不愧是马丁斯科塞斯监制的 腔调十足 / 裸眼VR酷刑真的吓死人了 / 缓慢track in 再加男主一连串的形容词 / talent vs imagination / 包裹家具真的…
Lucy Hale这种题材的电影真实驾轻就熟 跟男主好🈶️chemistry /冬天躲被窝里舔屏就够了 要什么逻辑！
假期看看爱情轻喜剧，关键是肉体好看，男女主之间有火花
作为一家出版公司联合首席执行官的助理，露西·赫顿（Lucy Hutton）和约书亚·坦普曼（Joshua Templeman）每天对面而坐，虽然他们彼此厌恶着对方。为了取得职业中的成功，二人开始了一场从外到内的较量与竞争，但是偶然的一次电梯事故，使二人的竞争关系发生了微妙的改变。
剧本值得细品，前期铺垫算牌人过往的部分很老辣，不知不觉就被算牌这个麦高芬带到他的内心世界，挣扎和期望建立起来之后再推倒。Tye Sheridan的角色算是外化算牌人内心矛盾冲突的其中一方。节奏控制很好，创造出惊悚悬疑感。Paul Schrader说把男主角安排成算牌人是因为算牌是等待的游戏。不足的可能只有视听，朴赞郁拍的话可以再拔高一个台阶。
美的都刚刚好，chemistry也刚刚好，非常棒
剧情还可以，一波三折的…… 剧中的一首插曲是我很喜欢的歌，听到很惊喜～
P.S. I think Danny is quite lovely! I'd love to have a friend like him~
这本书告诉我们，阶级不同的人，就别一头栽进去了，决对没有好下场。别说是夫妻爱人了，就连做朋友都难。阶级不同注定了，价值观，消费观各种观都不和，最初的激情消耗完了，还剩下什么，只能是各执己见的争吵了！
一再地反高潮、去繁琐。却比第一归正会有了更多的运动，那就是不断推进。摄影机穿梭于牌桌喧嚣、人间地狱、灯火阑珊，抵达奥斯卡深邃的眼底。USA那几位哥真的承包所有笑点。（电话那头差点认成是Carey Mulligan...
I want a boyfriend just like that. Lol
having my dinner alone with it, enjoyable
hmmmmm，主角翻脸不认人能力一流，比过家家还模式化
没办法耐心看完。和小说最大的差别，或者说背离是，男主角一直在笑是怎么回事？
怎么只有6分，瓣青品味太高了，我是土狗，我给十分。男主太像布鲁斯南了，我直接嘶哈嘶哈
剧情还可以，一波三折的…… 剧中的一首插曲是我很喜欢的歌，听到很惊喜～
简单的爱情片，适合十几二十岁的年轻人看，我是看女主脸蛋还不错才看的，她说话有时很快让我这老人家看得有点累。
无功无过爱情片，彼此顶嘴的话术还是可以学一学的。
+1星男主 totally my type
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
