Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
文牧野的第二部电影依然聚焦现实生活题材和底层小人物的故事，继药神后又迎来了组装小分队，展示各色“老弱病残”的众生相和奋斗史，一路跌跌撞撞、扶摇直上，最终涅槃逆袭的神奇奋斗故事，完美的点题电影名。整个时代背景也重现了改革开放后的深圳，正是一代代的打工人和外地移民推动了这座城市的飞速发展，让我们见证当今世界闻名的深圳之都，这部影片定能激励、帮助、推动更多在路上打拼的人，意义非凡，阳光普照。
宣传片还是能看出受了很大限制，不过对小人物的塑造和把控真是好。深圳是中国的未来。
看这部电影，整个下来就一个感受，就是流畅，就像看一个成熟的学者还在用“问题提出-研究方法-研究思路-研究结果”，这样的八股套路写论文一样，不出彩，但是整个下来很顺，理解起来也不难，该催泪的地方催泪，该振奋人心的时候振奋人心。不能说全是技巧，没有感情，但是确实在技巧这块，文牧野可以说驾轻就熟了。
导演太稳了，全程都是极度克制的叙事，靠各种细节来交代故事和人物关系，随着电影缓缓地进入，细节的力道越来越强，戏剧张力也逐渐拉满，最后在男孩床边转身时的一笑，既耐人寻味，又让人深思。阉割，伤口，皮绳和死亡，处处都是点破不说破的暗涌张力，导演的控制力称得上大师水准！
很励志，能克服重重困难，赚钱治好妹妹对一个刚成年的孩子，真的是个奇迹。但每一个奇迹的背后都是无数的拼搏，不放弃，还有一点点运气。
谁说打工人就一定是是好高骛远、投机倒把。有钱的资本家不费吹灰之力就能办到的事情，打工人需要付出百倍千倍的努力和艰辛。幸亏这个世界还有一帮敢于和命运抗争的打工人，也幸亏有了他们世界才更美好！谁说站在光里的才算英雄。
过程是现实，结局太理想，不过无论如何还是要好好努力，好好生活，心怀希望
我有點傷心。可能因為看到一半的時候開始關注前排大哥睡著打呼嚕，和他旁邊另一位大哥小心翼翼想要觸碰卻又收回的手。
就这种要惨就把人往死里整但是绝对不会死，要好转起来就完全不顾任何可能性的生硬转折，这种设定我真的受够了。 悲观如我从来不相信奇迹，只相信好事不常有，屋漏会逢连夜雨。 片子到最后喊口号式成功学甚至有点恶心到我。故事只值一星，给四字和章宇各加一星。
还是只有小时候是这样”
正能量深圳宣传片 都是好演员 故事就是鸡汤励志故事😁
勉强给个及格分。拍出《药神》的文牧野也让我失望了。很难共情，故事桥段和矛盾冲突设计的痕迹太明显了。太多“道德绑架”，太多“狗血鸡汤”，看开头猜到结尾系列，灵性还不如同题材的《一点就到家》。
PS：好羡慕哈琳，可以趴在千玺的怀里😂
所有的草台班子都会很温情，不知道谁搞得设定到处都在套用
十分推荐去影院观看！
易烊千玺未来可期！小妹妹好可爱好漂亮！
音乐铺太满了，感觉全靠音乐推。汪春梅不错。结局可以理解但狗屎，发布会前结束就好了。导演还是在很几个镜头里体现了水平的（比如第一次拆机的一系列镜头，田壮壮透过门卫室看哥妹两人的镜头）
最后妹妹抱抱他，说“你很累吧，谢谢你”很破防，确实是盔甲也是软肋。
主角没有人物弧光，显得单薄了些。不过易烊千玺凭借自己身上矛盾的少年稚气和成熟偏执，很大程度上弥补了这点缺失。
还可以吧，中规中矩的励志片，开场7分钟就把所有矛盾都摆在台面上，前30分钟就用了两次“BGM+快剪”，这就显得电影特别白，白到我根本不知道该说啥了，所有矛盾压着就让本来社会矛盾很尖锐的人们更加难受了，最后也依然是一套鸡汤取得了成功
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
