Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
「奥特曼」与「人间体」间关系的变迁想必也是个有趣的话题。
旧活新整，比TV好看一点，但也只有一点，还不知道是不是因为泽塔
不好看也不难看，没有正篇那么尬了。
{★★★★} 19世纪的新闻业与今时今日相比，到底有多大差异呢？它们都让我想起朋友对我说过的话：在资本主义下，人最宝贵的美德是诚实。所以不惜跟Pitchfork或Rolling Stone叫板，Robert Christgau都要做一个讨人嫌的、诚实的人。巴尔扎克讽刺金钱世界的名句太多，这里摘抄不下。但电影斥巨资搭建的这个虚拟的19世纪法国同巴尔扎克的文字一样折射出了阶级利欲的各方各面，而就像所有优秀的艺术，它首先是一部能娱乐你的电影--不啻说，残酷地娱乐。
终于还是蹭邪恶迪迦吃了点观赏分，泽塔也搬上来了，
不是我瞎编，是史诗巨作只拍出了地摊文学的感觉。And，到底是谁选泪沟哥本杰明挑大梁的？文森特和多兰都比他好太多了！不过，文森特什么时候能瘦回当年啊？本片旁白最好，功劳归于巴尔扎克，和导演无关。
我觉得很久没看到扎扎实实拍好名著的电影了，当然一部分也是归功于巴尔扎克的剧本，这本子用来阐述当下的演艺圈及上层社会和媒体圈乱象依旧不过时，人类真是毫无进步感
不行，还是差
谁再说你拿的不是女主剧本！Akito！ “俺也一样！”😎
并没有看过原著，还是鼓起勇气来把这部两个半小时的片子看完了。完全不闷，比想象的好看。讲的是一个年轻的外省诗人随贵妇情人进入巴黎、被丢下于是转行做小报记者、借助各路朋友敌人摸爬滚打逐渐声名鹊起、企图重新获得贵族头衔最终彻底幻灭的经历。复辟时期的巴黎这个宏大的历史画卷表现得非常迷人：剧院、报纸、出版人、富商、贵族、王室之间的各种勾当，寥寥几个场景就展现地一清二楚。对话非常辛辣（应该是巴尔扎克的功劳）让人印象深刻。此外导演应该是有意加了一些指射当下的元素吸引观众。
与TV真是瞎眼可见的差距
坏消息就是他在和TV比
想着并守护着彼此间重要的人；
原来现在人类的基地都跟变形金刚似的，奥特曼都像弗利萨，多重变身
剧情相较于特利迦TV要更加合理，属于典型的剧场版比剧好看
泽宝有些降智商，明明tv里泽塔能控制遥辉的，结果怎么成这样了，奥特曼要是和人合成后就这样了，那以后还是尽量幻化人形吧。
好消息就是这部比TV还不错
扎实的文本+高级的制作，着实讨厌不起来，哪怕充斥着广播剧一样的念白。而且故事对于我等中文系败犬来说太有吸引力了，过段时间找原著看看（其实已经借好了）。
与TV真是瞎眼可见的差距
真的很差啊 前期OK 从队长黑化开始就开始尬尬尬 一直尬到尾 而且黑暗特利迦有这么菜吗 我真的不能理解
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
