A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
请放心。
看完电影第一印象就是直呼过瘾！是近年来最接近于史诗般的战争片了。虽然176分钟不到三个小时，但一点也没有觉得长，剧情有张有弛却不拖沓，战斗场面枪林弹雨，紧张刺激，扣人心弦。虽说也有煽情之处，但为数不多，且情真意切，铁铮铮的汉子光荣牺牲，怎能不感人泪下？
这封信告诉先辈们：
真的是用血肉铸就新的长城，向革命先烈致敬。
向伟大的抗美援朝志愿军前辈先烈致敬！新中国成立后这场战役太苦了，太伟大，万恶的帝国主义，总想着侵略他国，电影院看完了，雷公走的那刻伤心，影片结束后字幕升起足足看了几分钟听完韩磊的歌，看完这么多演员员名单，一部电影那么多演职员看到真是付尽心血诚意满满向革命前辈致敬，不能忘记今天来之不易的和平生活，与美国战斗没有结束，台湾问题始终没有解决，与美国霸占搅局有关，象影片开始提到美国侵略到我国国土台湾所以必打抗美援朝这一战！期待祖国尽快统一那一天！再次致敬先烈，吾辈自强！为伟大中国复兴继续奋斗！
以人物单线始，兄长线在中段偏够就完成了转变，所以只有以群戏其他角色的悲壮来完成结尾升华，总觉得乱乱的怪怪的，重心不明，备受争议的网课镜头看到时真是会心一笑，小村庄的那场戏看着是节奏和视觉是最爽的，后面的则以全局呈现更多。以及观看的时候总是不自觉的想，战争片的内核应该永恒是反战。
都是英雄，上了战场都是英雄
致敬最可爱的人！
电影前面文戏铺垫的相当不错，后面战争部分情节紧凑，紧张感拉满，爆炸做得很好，人物群像我认为也刻画到位了，走出电影院我还记得他们每一个人的名字。我军吃能把牙硌掉的土豆，美军吃火鸡、喝咖啡；我军列车被炸只能步行，美军的飞机就在头顶上盘旋，这场战役的补给和装备差距都太悬殊了，最后的冰雕我直接绷不住了。虽然我个人觉得有些地方的剪辑不是很喜欢，结尾也有些仓促，但总体瑕不掩瑜，如果能有下一部就好了！
没有想象中那么好，剧情结构散乱，176分钟的片长，对于这部电影来说，稍微有点太长了。
并不是不恐惧❤️
纪念电影，3小时过长了，本身的纪念要求让剧情被刻意地拉长，使情节散了很多。其实严格意义上来说，与主要情节相关的就只有两场战役，中间塞入的很多其他情节反而是为了让观众产生共鸣的，略矛盾。本身并不会不好看，战争的质感还是很不错。
感谢他们，让我们有机会躺平了无病呻吟。
祖国河山真美 陈凯歌真牛 战场情境真实 最后兰晓龙本子也很牛 人物群像做的太好了 观众的视角就是易烊千玺的视角 和平真好啊
感谢先辈们的付出，祖国才变得强大，我们才能生活得幸福。😭
相当期待！导演名单里，若把陈换成张，林换成杜，保留徐老怪。那就会更好看了！
从影片一开始第一个镜头就说明了这电影没有按历史去拍，浓浓的现代风，完全没有哪个年代的感觉
完全超过预期，可以说是目前为止看过的最好的国产战争片了。完全展示出了战争的残酷，但很多地方又很温馨。对战友有春天般的温暖，对敌人像秋风扫落叶般残酷。
从这部影片创造的票房奇迹这一点，就能给它十个赞。连出版社出版的《血战长津湖》和《决战朝鲜》两部书都卖断货，至少让更多的国人愿意去了解70年前发生的事件。战争太残酷了，加上装备的差距和气候的严酷，真是惨烈。有两个细节印象深刻：一是北极熊全军覆没，冲进指挥部，说：“有些枪不能打”，军人，对真正的军人是敬重的，哪怕他是敌人；二是美军撤退时看见“冰雕”投去的尊敬的眼神。美中不足的是，主线对严寒表现得少了一些，其实从史料看，这是东线战场长津湖之战非常重要的特点
每个人物都立体鲜明，有血有肉。看完之后最大的感受就是要有对历史的敬畏心。对抗美援朝这段历史有了更深刻的了解，原来比我们书本上学到的要艰难千万倍。一定要铭记那些捍我中华、强我中华蚍蜉撼大树的英雄们！！！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
