Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
“人善人欺天不欺 人恶人怕天不怕”
在爱奇艺上刷到的，好奇看了看豆瓣评分居然有6.5，网大里绝对是上乘了。
一个字：绝。（即便所有人都知道的罗生门叙事还是相当有味道）
“戏子无义！”顶着玄幻标题讲人性，老生常谈，老标题党了。
虽然明知道不可能有怪力乱神，最后肯定能绕到正常里去，总体来说还可以，就是那帮工的设计的差事儿，大锄头居然砸不死人，折了以后打人屁股，这样的操作确实活不起！恐怖版《失信的村庄》！
两个孤独的灵魂互相拥抱取暖，阻力再大也不能将他们牵在一起的手分开。
回归了白鱼镇水准，人之恶和虚伪比起鬼狐更加可怕
好看，罗生门电影，到底哪一重是真的也无所谓。故事完整，前后接的上，还透露着现实的人性。
剧情ok，首位连接，没有bug。故事有点多，中途疲劳。最后结局画蛇添足，停在老爷子那里就可以了。不完全算民俗题材，但立意很好，值得一看。
想释放情绪或者想一个人冷静的时候，很适合看。但是，如果你觉得你还没准备好一个人静下心来，就别看。我并不觉得，哪个镜头是多余的。每个镜头的出现都有理由，它们是两个主角每天摆脱不了的梦魇，它们就是因为挥之不去，才会过了十年了还什么都没变——那么地善良、那么地无所谓、那么的痛苦。或者，在电影院看，代入感会更强。（建议别喝可乐，故事长，会上厕所…）
故事头尾可以自洽，甚至字幕完了还有个小有意思的彩蛋，还是不错的。然，从头到尾，对于取了个这种名字的电影，狐仙只是个幌子 ，不好意思，只能两星
谢锦这演员又是个魅力男人，有点小地包天，救命但还是受不了有魅力的
“事实和真相的距离，像月亮和地球之间的距离那样遥远。”虽说原著里有这么一句，导演刻意削弱了不被理解的部分，不停的渲染那种悲苦的情绪，世上可以万般顺意的毕竟是少数，多数时也或多或少有过各种emo，沉浸于emo之中不断的自虐，获得一种畸形的虐感，这片也太懂走不出emo的人，如原地踏步看似不断向前进实则毫无半点位移
老话题了
没有流量的网大剧，可以看出编剧的用心，演员也都充满血肉，挺不错的
作为曾经只有对方能理解自己的两个人，重逢之后这种感觉又回来了。在亮嫉妒趋势下对更纱实施暴力，对文进行骚扰之后，更纱与文重新走到一起。
只有他和她互相理解 无处可去 呆在对方身边
这剧本你牛逼了。。。可惜其他方面进步空间很大
想释放情绪或者想一个人冷静的时候，很适合看。但是，如果你觉得你还没准备好一个人静下心来，就别看。我并不觉得，哪个镜头是多余的。每个镜头的出现都有理由，它们是两个主角每天摆脱不了的梦魇，它们就是因为挥之不去，才会过了十年了还什么都没变——那么地善良、那么地无所谓、那么的痛苦。或者，在电影院看，代入感会更强。（建议别喝可乐，故事长，会上厕所…）
仿罗生门结构没铺垫式多重反转，好一个全员说谎人，全程故事节奏靠嘴巴和不断死人推动，质感还有最后那个长镜头的确是亮点，但总感觉故事还是没说好。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
