During the US Civil War, Union POWs escape in a balloon and end up stranded on a South Pacific island, inhabited by giant plants and animals. They must use their ingenuity to survive the dangers, and to devise a way to return home. Sequel to '20,000 Leagues Under the Sea' . Written by Stewart M. Clamen <[email protected]>
In 1865, during the siege of Richmond, Virginia, the union soldiers POW Captain Harding, Neb and Herbert escape in a balloon during a storm with two confederate prisoners, Sergeant Pencroft and the journalist Spilett. The uncontrollable wind takes the balloon to a mysterious island in the South Pacific in the area of New Zealand. Captain Harding self-proclaims the leader of the group and they look for food; sooner they discover that they are stranded in an island. Further, they are attacked by a giant crab that becomes their first meal. Along the days, they build a shelter and finds that the island is inhabited by giant animals. A couple of days later, they find two castaways on the beach, the aristocratic Lady Mary Fairchild and her sexy niece Elena. Later they find a trunk with weapons and instruments like sextant and shelter with a journal of a man left alone in the island by pirates. When the pirate vessel arrives in the island, they are helped by Captain Nemo of the Nautilus, a submarine that had supposedly sunk in the coast of Mexico eight years ago. Nemo is famous as the man that tried to end strike among man. When the volcano begins activity, they need to leave the island to save their lives. Written by Claudio Carvalho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
这让我想起了三国时期的军师和丞相 他们的作用可能超过了主公
影子军师，有光的地方就有影子。可惜，光又高尚到无法和影子共存，失去了胜利，而历史则是由胜利者书写的。
但因为这次大部分我没听懂 所以等有资源了再看一次后再打分吧😷
到底谁引爆了炸弹？为了正义的目地是否可以不择手段？你所谓的正义是否只是胜利？因为历史由胜利者书写。政治就是一场戏，可俺们只有看戏的资格，因为人民不是公民。
对付君子有君子的办法，对付小人就只能用诡计。国民是盲目的，只要是对的，最终的胜利者采用的过程手段都是有阴暗的一面。
我以为最后肖去做卧底，最后再反转一把，不是更好。李的表演更有层次感。
开展五分之四的剧情后，整部电影急转直下，估计不知道怎么编了。光是前面的五分之四也已够了。
主角人物光环过于强大，失去了可信性，影响了对剧情的认同感
有点掉书袋和刻意了。最喜欢是鸡蛋故事的首尾呼应以及电影中的光影。
电影本身的功底很深，抛开电影本身之外讲理念，正义从来不是看你做了什么，而是看你为了什么，一门里，有人是面子就得有人是里子
而棒国政坛，再光明的愿景也与黑幕相伴，也是积重难返的畸形。
①:那個正義要是一個人的正義怎麽辦?
导演好像把所有的能量都用在中场楼梯的“密室政治”戏中，那段的走位铺排，美术置景，寓意内涵，人物关系剑拔弩张，相当精彩，但十分可惜的是，后半段流于形式般的结束，又回到了国际市场那样年代片的套路，而且选举政治的展示是否过于“脸谱化”
道不同，不相为谋啊。一个谋士出的主意主上都不认同，也不相信他，那俩人真的不合适
整部剧节奏太枯燥，就选举那段戏看着有点来劲。
这部入围今年百想电影部门最佳影片最佳导演最佳双男主。薛景求的表演自然不必说，但李善均虽然海报上排第二，他的表演才是亮点啊，搞不好今年会拿影帝。但这部故事本身说白了还是民族、大义主旋律，最后还打友情牌，我不是很喜欢。我是《南山的部长们》那挂的。
韩国选举制就有问题，各种脏手段层出不穷，这就是自由民主？韩国总统有几个善终的？
3.5 比较习惯韩国的剧情片，不觉得慢或者无聊，但确实没什么高潮
结合最近已经结束的韩国大选来看，这电影实在是讽刺意味拉满。不如电影中表现出来的理想，现实中资本主义框架下的民主自由一潭死水，无论保守还是激进亦或是曾经的独裁，韩国人民要走的路依旧漫长
4.10下午和mao AA在3段4层会议室观看，字幕太差劲了，勉强看明白剧情了，有点意思。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
