A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
太逗了
知难而上的逆行
吸取了前两作文不对题的教训像我提议的那样（不）设定在了录像带全盛期的九十年代，形式做旧逼真了几个故事却比较乏味，电视记者探访下水道族群这个节目形式质感还原很不错，印尼那篇改造人挺日漫画风的就是太长了后半纯撒血用，主线剧情开场时貌似很屌的挖眼看录像设定结果什么糊糊收尾太不用心啦。
#2022 圣丹斯# 探讨关于本体和克隆体二选一存活的伦理困境，可惜的是没有能够深挖道德冲突和人性本质，一切都流于表面，最后的结局也是过于草率，浪费了一个好的题材
小粉跳操太可爱了
克隆人也是有人权的，为了这个理念甚至不惜要与真身决斗，这是中世纪嘛，搞笑
結局是開放性的，我個人認為是本主活了下來，所以最後會哭，因為她發現自己冒充復製人後，媽媽和男朋友對復製人的態度和原先的自己沒有任何區別，他們只是為了滿足自己而需要一個這樣的角色存在而已，實際同樣沒有真實的愛和情感，所以她坐在車上失落地哭了。真是個悲傷的結局，她贏回了人生，卻輸掉了一切。
想法很好，但设定中两个人必须死一个的缺陷有点大，剧情推进也缺少故事性，完全服务于情绪与性格渲染了
应该没有什么反转，活的就是复制体，最后一场戏，本体衣服是羽绒服毛内衣黑裤系带鞋，最后出现的人，外衣和鞋子是本体的但内衣裤子都是复制体的，如果活的是本体根本没必要去换复制体的内衣裤子。所以很可能是复制体毒杀本体后换走了相对容易更换的衣鞋，且后面跟裁判描述车祸时用的也是不懂车的语言。最后哭应该是活下来后承担了本体的债务和人生感到的痛苦。，，，，至于为什么复制体要冒充本体，可以理解为如果是本体失踪那么作为尚无人权的复制体面临的后果可能很严重，而反之则相对容易。
本体好惨 但没想到克隆体也不咋地 都逃不过生活的摧残哦呵呵
不过复制体鲜少有情绪波动，所以我更倾向于本体活了下来，也可能是我主观上更希望本体活下来。
荒诞、冷酷、黑色幽默，让我想起了《龙虾》。
冰冷的复制制度下，毫无人德可言。。。结局是本体假装复制体活的概率大一些？太可恶了，自己的复制体取代自己还要给自己的复制体付钱，气死。全家人只希望拥有心中所想的女主无情无义
跳着看的。好压抑。最后也没看懂哪一个生存下来了
我完全不知道这电影在拍什么东西，还有星云本人演技是有点差了
还是星云那个说话语气和表情。她真是本色演出
我觉得结尾段挺出彩的，根据细节克隆体应该一直暗中观察学习本体的生活方式，用一年的时间酝酿好了怎么杀死本体，但是杀死本体又有什么用呢，即使不喜欢依然要继续本体操蛋的生活，不能按自己的方式生活这样还算活着吗
设定挺有意思，虽然整部电影的演员都是一副面瘫的样子，而且完全没有任何波澜，但不影响剧情走向和发展，克隆人真的是一种违背人伦的存在啊……三星半。
VHS老粉了，伪纪录片中的重口味邪典。94和之前的系列在风格一脉相承，但故事上，除了第三个机械实验灵光乍现，其他都太平庸和保守（见过前三部的大风大浪，这部看得内心毫无波澜）。镜头虽然还是很糊，但摆拍比较明显，真实感大打折扣。贯穿拼盘的主线故事也含糊不清，略失望吧。
用一场泯灭人性的决斗来决定谁更有资格做人活下去。虽然复制体更了解人性，也最后利用了人性，但是却更没有人性，顶替了别人的生活，也终究沦为了一个彻头彻尾机器人般的替代品。有些人生，还是从头体验的好。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
