Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
关于一个小错误引发了一场小悲剧，受害者却用一个个更大的错误引起更大的悲剧的故事。
“听RED不是必然是《有心论》和《两个人》嘛”
不理解为啥大家在如此生死攸关的时刻却都要B哧个没完。 让个一会就死的人理解你的人生意义爱恨情仇，再看看你最酷造型儿就这么重要吗？看得我着急死了。
作家智商高情商低，女助手开放妩媚惹人误会。
情节太离谱，精神病碰撞出的火花。这部电影宣传的是宗教邪门儿，给你一种冥冥之中的注定。仇恨的情绪与精神分裂相互作用，一系列毫无关系的死亡被强行附加进来，其实无关，却让男女主和观众感到有关。
这剧情把警察写的像傻子，没有警惕性。前面无聊，后面逻辑性不够。
This movie gives comfortable mood in the first act and heartwarming in the other hand It give the big issue that your yakubd.net love is true or just one word. Many thing I don't like which all characters are flat and awkward conversation.
6.5+，有点虚张声势。通篇好像讲了什么，结果有什么都没讲。但是，如果是真的，那么这跨度十数年的复仇 真的是细思极恐的。这也是阳谋胜于阴谋的原因，我就是要看你明知道结局却无能为力的样子。
pff30 原来我以为充满无法一言以蔽之的意象、有耐心和张力的节奏、撒点聪明的黑色幽默和见微知著的人物剪影就应该能生产好电影，但当一位墨西哥导演也用这种欧洲auteur的格式做作品的时候，我就会多想……我就会想啊Franco你到底是要干嘛，你是要讽刺还是被白老头们同化了。这片子值得看，不过在家看还是去电影院看都没差……
把所有更加难以解释的困顿推给了死亡的预告，真的很令人大失所望
悬念铺垫，反转再反转，最后一个绝症梗。
开篇的叙事还不错，但进入中段就变得糟糕了，无意义的情节展示对人物性格的揭示毫无用处。难怪我不喜欢，原来用的加缪《局外人》的梗。《局外人》的哲学思考我认同，但人物刻画却很不合理。39分钟弃剧。
0 虽然知道评价低，想着好歹有甘斯布，好家伙，甘斯布加起来戏份有5分钟吗？《新秩序》人物是空壳好歹摄像机保持足够的距离，观众可以以围观者的身份去猎奇，而在这里稀释了机械的群体而保留那唯一的空壳，只会让人反胃
也不是在一些エモい的地方取景就可以拍一些エモい的故事
感觉剧本和其他制作部分是剥离的，使得电影作为filter套上任何其他的故事也能成
当你想看一部打打杀杀的电影时，这部电影可以填个空。#20220204
蔚蓝晴空，日正当中，中年男子尼尔与家人在墨西哥的度假胜地，享受奢华的悠閒假期。白天在泳池边小酌，晚餐与乐手暗送秋波，一切都十分惬意，直到手机铃声划破空气。电话那头母亲病况危急，大家只好收拾行李，搭上下一班回国的飞机，不料尼尔在登机口找不到护照，只能与家人分道扬镳。走出机 场，尼尔搭上计程车，开往的却不是回饭店的方向，而是市区的破烂旅社⋯⋯。
一个忍不住的性骚扰，变成两家人的家破人亡，太刺激了吧
放弃解释，也因此放弃了叙述；放弃了配乐也放弃了任何试图引发观众情感共鸣的可能；放弃了面孔，所有角色都在中景内克制地神秘着…放弃了一切的电影，却把悬疑保持到了最后一刻。弗氏Manipulation一如既往奏效，但他想表达的“虚无”，在他用尽了一切减法形式后显得是如此刻意而矫揉造作。
今年最佳大爽片，编剧牛逼，反派角色牛逼，坏人太多了一环接一环，各自打自己的小算盘，悬疑感笑料娱乐元素十足，演技全程在线，摄影全程在线。内华达拉斯维加斯警局故事，黑色幽默有点儿昆丁的感觉，但没太血腥。一个警局场所拍的如此细腻，杀入警局那场戏估计能载入影史，警局到最后还有点儿生化危机浣熊市PD的感觉，目测能入围一个最佳编剧最佳男配。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
