Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
只能说在美国任何事都可以当成生意 as long as you make yourself believe first and sell it very very hard. 在这点上ellen show, 玛莎斯图尔特, 奥普拉还有Tammy Faye都无一例外，性取向、家政、种族、宗教都可以拿来挣钱，无可厚非；傻的只有在电视前热泪盈眶的沙发土豆罢了。
劳模姐真的很拼，所以也很可惜，影片流水账式的叙事实在拉跨
画面不错，印象里小学看的剧场版都还挺好的，不知道为什么这个这么无聊……
Reagan, Christian, 70/80s America. formulaic biography, brilliant acting
要不是六一无处去，也不会陪女儿来看这个电影。好在女儿看完了，我在一旁无聊的抠脚。
/见到静香还是一如既往的自然微笑，太太太好看好看好看了。
两星半。是每年颁奖季里都会有的，专门为了演员的演技而量身定做的电影，除了加菲和劳模姐的演技，一无是处。
忘记标了，和前年的的《朱迪》一样，都是推女主表现，故事拉胯。
劳模的光芒万丈，覆盖了加菲。
这让我想到了王小帅的那个天才地久，无聊的故事，惊人的演技！加菲是本色出演吗？劳模姐太强大了，今天看了coad那么温馨的人，又看这么做作的！好分裂的一天！
纯为了捧女主角的电影，并不好看，而且逻辑很混乱
流畅的剧本，一气呵成的故事，其中的转折不显突兀，贵在导演没刻意的卖惨
很认真地说，如此的电影结尾，必须搭配真人塔米·菲的性格，可以勾连的当然也就是劳模姐巨做作的精彩（无贬义）表演，问题在此呼之欲出，这基本很难说是传记，简单地说，从一败涂地中再次站起和性格已经没啥关系了，无非是做戏不得不这么搞而已，当然更可以上升为致命的结构或解构不当问题，为劳模姐影后预告加一星吧，这么多年了，媳妇也早该熬成婆了。
情节低龄，主题混乱，配色炸眼。
中规中矩吧(小夫的设定有成长线 就感觉是真实的人啦 遇到危险会害怕会逃避 但也还是会为了朋友们而站出来
妆发和表演是完全值得肯定的，但涉宗教的美国电视、娱乐文化可能和我有极大距离，即便内容重点在于Tammy的人生态度、奋斗、境遇，刨开宗教，其实表达的人生跌宕不分国界，但宗教和文化真的是一座很厚的壁垒。总体三星半。
劳模姐真的，量变导致质变了，加菲被远远甩在后面，就像小李子和温斯莱特
喜欢“天赐我们自由”这句台词，但是故事太幼稚，没必要把动画和政治联系上。对静香的刻画看得有点不太舒服。另外满大街画像真的有老大哥即视感…
锁定影后奥提没有悬念，哪怕奥斯卡的小金人给劳模姐也绝对值得！面部倒模+特效化妆，劳模姐的自毁式出演完全让人忘掉她本身的模样，被完全带入到Tammy Faye的人生历程中。与此同时，Tammy台上台下截然相反的两重形象也被演绎得淋漓尽致。在聚光灯下、摄影机前，是丰富的表演人格，挺胸抬头、自信活泼、积极且具有煽动力。而当褪去光鲜的背后，她躲在黑暗的角落、窝在空荡的房间里，是无尽的怀疑、隐忍与失落。
因为对原型和事件都很陌生，我看不出什么宗教意义，就只看到一个在原生家庭缺少肯定的女人，把一生用在获得爱和给予爱的宗教上。她从一开始就说自己不是决定谁上天堂的人。她的浮夸、虚荣、做作、绝望的婚姻、同情心、包容、虔诚…让她完整而立体。相比起来Jim就单薄多了，几乎就是个一直消费她和孩子们的令人生厌的角色。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
