Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
美雪太温柔了！谁不想被好好对待，谁能拒绝得了温柔！搁谁不沦陷其中！
老实说 我没太看懂 到最后一幕以前都觉得女主是个任性的“坏女人”
温暖治愈的画风、“迷途之家”的设定以及许多“奇妙物”“妖怪”的想象都不错，但是剧情上各种无力，尤其最后的打怪收尾过于仓促了[Facepalm]
开1.5倍速都嫌慢的程度…剧情挺无语的…本质上还是拍成了两女争一男的傻瓜疼痛青春片。虽然两个女生亲了做了，但真的莫名其妙…能不能少拍点这种玩意儿…唯一的优点是女主是适合演百合的脸
女二性格上就是不大懂拒绝，和男主的感情也止步于牵个手。结果，让女主钻了空子。结局是我没想到的，男主最后和谁在一起没有表达。但是，女主和女二百合了这是真的。
故事情节平平淡淡，但是很多温情的内容，展现了向往的乌托邦生活。女主被治愈的过程没有很清楚，但或许就是在这种温情的环境中自然就慢慢自愈了吧。画面就不说了，通片都是壁纸。有很多可爱的情节，譬如船在水上走，是河童在推它；奶奶和那个神的对话；姐姐难过时候，妹妹依靠在姐姐身上。最后打怪的情节有人觉得太快了，我觉得正好，反正我是不喜欢明明知道怪会被打败，还一直在那里来回。
虽然女主自私又任性 女二的三观跟着五官走 但是大丈夫是爱情啊
看了一小时又十分钟30秒。还有30分钟。我看不下去了。
感觉今年五月是拖延症最严重的一个月。为了躲避自己做的list看了好多电影。上班前最后一部电影，基调慢慢的，但是看着格外舒心。前面节奏很棒，最后高潮部分或许是因为制作时间长短的缘故收尾的好仓促。但总体不失为一部很棒的电影！
我可能老了…曾经最喜欢看的类型——动画电影居然断断续续看了一两个礼拜，难道是我没有童心了？明明画风和故事都很治愈，srds一下就打败小蛇也有点太bug了……
在最近非常脆弱的时候，这部动画给了我勇气和力量。
剧情略草率，差点意思，当作放松随便看看的，芦田爱菜配音还可以
前半段现实主义，后面突然进入妖怪的世界，完全割裂。节奏冗长，高潮戏大战竟然瞬间结束，过于简单
就像这迷途之家一样，会更好的呀
我还以为是校园纯爱电影，结果她们都有点不正常。
2021.7.30-2022.4.29
为啥评分这么低啊，真奇怪，看到非血缘关系的亲情就果断进来了哈哈，讲了朴素的温暖的道理，剧情简单，还是挺喜欢的5555
伤痛不一定非要用尽方法去治愈它，每天平静的生活下去，就已经在化解伤痛。
被粉色纸鹤树带给的氛围迷住了。行动力max的女主却封闭着自己的内心，造成了这难以理解的三角恋，好吧，也许就是只需要那么一瞬。
小立本！这种片多拍！！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
