A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
每个片段单独看还好，但拼在一起就一整个莫名其妙，网飞能不能不要再拍这种究极缝合怪了？！看完我甚至能确定，高司令演的真人版芭比，都会比这部好看
摄影加点分吧，故事和设计都太老套，还加上萝莉与大叔的戏份
比网飞一般自制还是好一些的，开场的烟花戏打斗很漂亮，布拉格的电车戏也算是相当有诚意了，高潮打美队的设计差点意思，可能美队太贵了，打美队就够了
还挺好的周五晚电影。不管怎么说高司令仍然很可，桃总也特别适合演这种变态反派，禁欲西装的Rege更是性感出天际，仅仅冲着这些就可以及格了。打斗戏是多少有点弱，不过也还算干脆吧。镜头画面和光影色调真的很讨喜，很多地方的确有2049的恍惚感。然而故事和逻辑上确实还是太弱了（大部分和小姑娘沾边的情节都很说不通），不合理的地方多到加强版主角光环都可以忽略了（Six的开挂程度简直堪比正当防卫的Rico）。片子舞台全球铺开不过却有点割裂，有种为了全球化而全球化的感觉。但是不管怎么说吧，整体看下来观感尚可，在网飞的动作大电影系列里面算是很好的了（比鬼影特攻好出了一整个红色通缉令的程度，比惊天营救还能稍稍强一点）。所以还是愿意给到四星，而且期待有续作能够把故事圆回来一些（虽然一般都是越描越黑）。
小高辣死我，战术手套高帮靴，又帅又潇洒，好装好喜欢。在我性癖上跳舞，打戏让人看得心头荡漾🥵
摄影加点分吧，故事和设计都太老套，还加上萝莉与大叔的戏份
明明是随便拍拍都不会太难看的特工题材，偏偏这部拍得很无聊很中庸。白瞎了炸裂的卡司，最近好莱坞爆米花大片堆砌明星有点厉害啊，可惜这部高司令+美队+邦女郎也救不回。高司令的角色还算ok，美队的角色真的坏得莫名其妙而且完全没有任何铺垫描述来丰富人设（小胡子造型差点不敢认），安娜没有007里那么惊艳但还是美的可惜只是个工具人。看在带我云环游世界的份上，勉强三星半吧。PS唯一比较喜欢的是It's just another Thursday.
Netflix类似片子全是雷！每次我都被炸了！
鸡肋的剧本与台词，台词给人的感觉就是肚里没什么货却硬要装出幽默深沉，有些尴尬，后来发现是罗素兄弟的作品，我联想到漫威电影中充斥着各类如上所述的台词，那也不足为奇了。Evans饰演的反派还真的够油的，他演反派给我的印象都很类似，比如Knives Out中的富二代，自恋自大又目中无人。Gosling的形象也有点Blade Runner 2049中仿生人的感觉，再配上开局各种霓虹灯装饰的赛博朋克风格场景，还真以为在看2049…无人机的长镜头炫技还算是成功的吧，但是不是用的有点多了。200万美元的投入换来这样的拼接怪作品，网飞早就该长点记性削减一些类似的流水线爆米花粪作了吧，否则导演和演员的钱未免也太好挣了。
害行啊，不难看。盲猜被诟病的原因是因为太多明显的融梗？
5- 罗素兄弟都把爆米花塞到你嘴里了，如此喧闹嘈杂却也不忘记从Cliche中汲取浪漫。
看个过瘾吧，一⭐给全程打戏的高司令，一⭐给一直没认出来的桃总，一⭐给风景，一⭐给特效。剧情？爽剧要什么剧情，过瘾就完了。
高司令帅不在脸，他举手投足，都用一种他标志性的优雅，别人学都学不来的那种
完全是糟蹋了这么高的预算和这么好的卡司
队，勉强也算得上无脑娱乐的消暑之作了。2.5星。。。
队，勉强也算得上无脑娱乐的消暑之作了。2.5星。。。
挺好看的 远远算不上烂片 我看烂片经验很丰富的
哎，现在的动作片为什么都这么无聊？哪个小女孩能不爱Ryan Gosling！
都应该感谢格林格拉斯！低配版谍影重重，前面很有看头，但是最后一幕太老套，做了很多无用功，导致电影逻辑有问题
电影工业高度发达了就开始生产流水线垃圾了是吧
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
