Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
真的好平庸，也不好笑，但是好多明星客串。Ps：抖音网红女演员是导演女儿，和演euphoria lexi的Maude Apatow是姐妹关系，她当时出场的时候我就觉得她俩长得真像。
憋疯的人会懂。喜欢居家的我也能理解。还是很好笑的。
有的人在家被禁锢了一个多月，迫切的想出门；
作为囚禁片剧情方面没有太大硬伤，节奏和人物塑造也是比较稳的，但是逃出来后的结尾部分处理得不好。
超小成本，也没有紧张刺激，也没有特别烂，但就是剧情不温不火，即使你边干别的事，再回来，还是能接上。
涉不涉及灵异？开场的一些镜头很误导人。空间小，人物少，张力拉满。女主戒毒，打算卖了母亲留下的房子，带两个娃去其他州讨生活。娃爸是毒虫，交的朋友是恋童癖。怎么说呢，整个故事就是当妈太难了，女儿四岁左右，儿子一岁不到，光是跟女儿好好说话就累得不行。结局蛮好，女主不搬家了，找到了母亲留下的苹果黄油制作秘籍：苹果变色了没关系，去掉坏的部分就行，这种苹果做出来的苹果黄油最好
很好笑，跟多双关，要对美国发生的事情有一定了解才会get到更多笑点吧。
Boring 5分钟扫完的电影 一点不惊悚
Reflective of the present condition in shanghai, but a terrible comeback for Apatow. Seized by a riveting start, yet got bored half way through. Staying till the end felt like journey on a rocky path.
不可思议，Maroon 5主场Adam竟然还给这部剧作了首结尾曲啊。
作为一个已经封闭了一个月的上海市民 看这片真是感觉银幕内外形成了一种近乎荒谬的互文 Freedom is the fuck out of here！（That‘s the cocaine talking right there.
4.1上映挺合适的。
I'm here for the horny Pedro part… anyone?
沙雕，网飞真是啥都敢投资，哈哈哈，建议看，毕竟挺欢乐的。
时间太长了...导致变成了相当割裂的长段子，但多少还是有点乐子。阿帕图女儿直接带资进组可还行。
好了好了，爹咪别秀了。
三演员带两孩子，拍成这样不算难看。而且要素多，囚禁、逃生、家庭、温情等等，麻雀虽小五脏俱全。属于小微成本电影里比较成功的。
哈哈哈哈荒诞艺术。该死的virus到底啥时候是个头呀！！！！
虽然想槽的点很多 但是导演自己在片里都吐槽完了…… 所以也没剩啥留给观众来槽的了……
一个剧组疫情下拍片的搞笑故事，黑好莱坞挺厉害的，凯伦吉兰现在怎么一直拍这类无聊的作品？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
