A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
强烈的溺水之感。然而只展示情绪的代价有点大，总给我一种小K演了个疯婆子的错觉。
在圣诞假期里，戴安娜意识到她受到了冷暴力的精神凌虐，度假宫殿仿佛已成为囚牢，一想到童年时的快乐时光她就分外想重新得到自由。
聚光灯都打在她的身上，压得喘不过气。当戴安娜王妃迷路时，所有人都只是看着，没有一只手指向她需要前往的地方。不过至少最后，她和那群雉鸟都逃出了这高高的，隐形的宫墙。小K演得像不像我不敢妄下定论，但我至少知道，她的一颦一笑，都有足够的感染力与说服力。
虚幻与现实交织就如裙子上的外套一样，唯一让人醒目的是夹克和伤口的血红色；除了男权对女性的压迫，很多的是否是灵魂在时空牢笼中的困境。摄影师这次真的开大了，甚至有点找到打开马利克的方法了
接近恐怖片的手法，氣氛營造得不錯，但若果皇冠第五季是這樣的風格我應該一集就會關掉。Kristen很努力，但其他演員的選角實在太差。/睇完想食KFC。
Pain delivered through Jonny Greenwood.
小K的表演也是过度的，而又毫无变化与渐进。人前是一种做作的柔弱凄美，人后那些骂脏话的片刻则带有一些来自演员本人的嚣张，像精神分裂。
我的王妃，何苦为难我们这些不能违背誓言辛苦的社畜打工人呢。
又一个安妮柏林?哈哈哈,别忘了安妮柏林抢走了别人的婚姻~。
很美很美很美，慢节奏当中揭示很多细节，将十几年浓缩为几天。又好像痛苦但又好像没那么痛苦。但确实很美。
王妃的牢笼，有这种感觉，但在剧情设计上有些没有重点。贯穿于影片的一种矛盾聚焦准确，但戴安娜王妃细节处的刻画只能算是无功无过，没有给我眼前一亮之感。
且不说王冠珠玉在前，并不是每个观众都熟读并背诵英国皇家那些事儿的好吗？上来就指望观众共情是不是太贪心了/色调好舒服
故事应该叫做 让王妃穿好衣服按时吃饭有多难
挺好看，这部传记片的风格是心理电影路线，大胆的加入了很多幻想，比如吞食珍珠、与16世纪的安妮·博林王后神魂相遇，尤其是濒临崩溃边缘那段MV式蒙太奇，拍出了枷锁桎梏的压抑，也拍出了希望。
我说这个风格这么Jackie的。。。原来是同一个导演，然而时过境迁，丫哈退步了，意识流到了极致就是发神经，健康的我不太能共鸣了，主要原因除了剧本垃圾还在于小K不及波曼，且丫的英式口音太硬了，还有哪个歇斯底里的劲儿，我是真的听不清她说的啥，当然也是我回国两个月英语变差了 - -！
和《第一夫人》的镜头语言一致，和对立人物对话全用正反打，和亲近人物在一起用同框镜头。
知晓导演想表达什么，压抑解放blablabla，但看完只觉得无病呻吟，配乐也不喜欢。ks个人特色（长相姿态）太明显演传记片差了点。
不论历史如何，影片的切点真的很好啊。说是套层也好，counterpart也好，极其工整地假借历史展开叙述。以出轨为引子引出性别置换的特殊语境，相当自然的女性主义。尽管稍后的对戴安娜对普通人生活的向往、以及当一个普通母亲的愿望的渲染实则有些无视王室的无奈，但还是包裹住了一层对僵化制度的反讽。
一出独角戏。Kk演技进步惊人，配乐很阴间。不是提前知道剧情，分分钟以为自己在看《闪灵》
怎会有如此做作的电影…还有，小K，我们不要再挑战自己，演这么需要演技的角色了好吗？看得我如坐针毡，芒刺在背，坐立不安。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
