Ten years ago, Ginny (Toni Gonzaga), an Architecture student, and Marco (Piolo Pascual), a History professor, began a one-of-a-kind and unpredictable love story. In the five years that they were together, they brought out the best in each other, which included Marco's unrealized dream of becoming a chef. Together, they worked towards their dream of opening up a restaurant, but when Ginny realized her own pursuits were different from his, she rejected his wedding proposal and left the country for a Masters degree in Architecture. At present, Ginny co-owns a one-stop Architecture and Interior Design firm specializing in Restoration. She receives an email from Marco, which was written and sent after their break-up, meant to be read four years later. It makes her feel even more regretful of leaving the love of her life. When their firm receives an offer to restore an old house into a restaurant, she is ecstatic to learn that Marco will be co-owning the restaurant. She takes this as a sign...
I'll never give up Germany.
让大家更了解当时的时局，和张伯伦的决定不易
为慕尼黑阴谋洗地和当年的行为同样厚颜无耻，西方的历史修正主义已经没有下线。
这个画面确实很暧昧
剧情张力有，两位小哥选角到位。有洗白张伯伦的倾向，不过已经盖棺定论的事要虚构发挥的空间不大。结尾人物逻辑稍欠佳，小人物突然明白自己无法撼动历史走势，有一种后见之明。
英国人就是这样的厚颜无耻，一个墩克尔克大溃败能让他们拍成常凯申式的战略“转进”，一个对希特勒无限让步出卖捷克利益的慕尼黑协定居然被它说为和平争取了时间，为最终战胜纳粹德国做好了准备。可事实是什么？要不是希特勒脑袋抽筋儿去进攻苏联，要不是美国看到有利可图重演一战的“参战”剧情，英国人早就跟法国人一起学习德语了。
润物细无声的洗白和一惯的精致利己主义，还有白皮至上的刻在骨子里的种族主义，和希特勒本质上没有区别
历史题材可能限制不小，故事来说就显得很平，影片好像过了1/3才交代去德国的任务，这样就进入得太慢了啊，但是还算拍得工整，一众卡司不错。
两个小哥是牛津校友 冒生命危险盗取文件交给张伯伦 张却不愿意承认 宁愿自己骗自己 人总是相信有利于自己的情况会出现 优点就是两方元首都挺喜欢提携自己的年轻人的 即使知道年轻人不同意自己
------
还行吧，没事可以看看，真实政治背景下编造的人物故事
我不理解但我大受震撼，平均五分钟一个慢镜pose，这种直白的表达风俗，也明白了为什么加勒万河谷的三三们，是如此的表现和战力了。
剧情非常契合今天的夜宵烧烤暴力事件，结局是男女老幼所有人都获得了枪，每个人都该有把枪。不常见的南印度泰卢固语，抛开开挂问题，动作设计特别有意思而且很燃。每次起跑出拳都要匀速慢镜头特写让人以为动作指导是扎克施耐德。
抗击侵略者的神剧教科书，除了时间太长之外，几乎无短板。双男主实在太好磕了。
观感比巴利霍利差多了，双男主设定，两个胡须佬。开场十分钟无法直视，没想到后面都这样，想来这是印度片的特色。与白人女性那几场戏仿佛京都球侠
8.要是印度人70多年前就有这股反抗精神，不至于混成现在这个样子.
角度很有意思
PS：我选二弟。
4.这原始的攻击方式真的超帅，可惜了，电影就这段算有点帅！
Paul真的好美貌☺️😋
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
