This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .
一开始氛围挺好（得益于配乐），后面越来越混乱以及奇怪，想要拍女性面对孩子的不知所措崩溃的情感，没问题，那又加那么多奇奇怪怪悬疑的家族对抗戏份呢？？？
拿走娃娃说就是玩儿，这动机我居然好像李姐了——搁这玩母职束缚觉醒游戏呢，结果还没等说出“你要觉醒”就被小母亲捅了。好怪
本来也看不来费兰特的书，影像处理又不如让-马克·瓦雷，实在实在看不来。没可能只要和某些议题挂勾就拿高分的，和政治正确有什么差别
闪回的插叙、消失的娃娃、孩子的吵闹，营造了一个悬疑而又紧张的氛围，正如Leda烦躁不安的情绪，更加凸显了女性角色的局促。
怎么说呢，都是最平常的日子，虽然淘气却可爱的女儿，可是却是无法忍受的伤痛。女孩子没有被教育人生有多艰难，她们要背负的是什么，为家庭牺牲人生，她们只被教育爱情的美好和成为母亲的伟大。镜头的冲击让最平凡的场景变得尖锐，像一把锥子扎进女主的心里。有些女孩在年轻的时候被情话哄骗然后懵懵懂懂中自我安慰，还有些女孩终于在煎熬半生后后知后觉。那些伤痛不会离去，社会不会改变，也无人理解和倾诉，最后不过是茕茕孑立。今年奥斯卡的女权电影都太有质量了。
偷走娃娃的另一种解读：女儿没有娃娃会更加折磨母亲，她想看着那位年轻母亲生活地愈加疲惫，而合理化自己当初抛弃女儿们的行为。
边看边觉得烦躁，不会控制情绪的人不该生孩子
精彩绝伦的处女作。寇曼演得太让人相信了。可惜，过去的片段几个矛盾点拍得太具体了。
演员出身首执导筒的玛吉·吉伦哈尔交出了一份不错的答卷，片子在视听与表演上可圈可点。
Olivia女神！服裝不知道是不是她自己的，每一套都很好看，貼合本人/ Alba Rohrwacher怎麼腫得跟氣球一樣/ 期待Maggie Gyllenhaal更多導演作品！/Maggie選角：跟老公Peter Sarsgaard做愛時說“誒，你活兒不錯，要不要在我電影裡演？”於是教授誕生> 0 <
臆想症到了极致的人怕不就是这样的吧？到处乱约，见人就上 还偷东西。。真nice最后车祸居然没死也是coooooool
1，本片译作《失去的女儿》是不是更合适？
年轻时背叛家庭的选择，使得惩罚在此后多年来的自己身上应验。科尔曼一次又一次泪目，晕头转向不知所措，抱紧偷来的娃娃，都让这个复杂的人物有了深刻的诠释。她是母亲，也是罪人，她改变不了别人，改变不了任何东西，可就是改不了心中仍存在的母爱。
Maggie犹如写散文一般创作了这部作品，情绪高于故事。如此女性，如此细腻。
看不懂，但直接明确地感受到了妈妈的崩溃，母职的荒谬。
依赖了女主角精准出色的表演
怎么讲呢 五味杂陈吧 女儿和母亲的关系本身就很难描述 是一种极其特别的情节。爱 嫉妒 恨 眷恋 牵挂 参照物 又十分想要避免被别人看出来有彼此的影子。这个女作家的小说本来就很不好改变，电影拍出了女性复杂又无解的心理状态，但同时这不是一部拍给普罗大众观看的电影，因为它需要很多的心领神会。
可能我期待一个更邪恶的母亲、、感觉还是没有完全够及一个母亲向母职惩罚复仇时内疚和隐秘邪恶之间的复杂纠葛
太喜欢两位女演员的表演了！科尔曼说来就来的恸哭秒了曼切斯特的小米，娓娓道来的细腻恍惚鲍起静上身，而巴克利的脸就很莎莉霍金斯，充满了故事。女性的矛盾有展现，尾收的还可以再高级一点。
很多幸福的瞬间，却仍抵挡不住累得想放弃。那些隐秘的，向内挖的伤痕，也许只有经历过才能切肤感受。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
