Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
生命不是肉体的延续而是信息的传递。多年以后,父亲壮年的背影,孩子童年的画面,母亲清秀的模样.…..都传递给了谁？谁就活着。芬奇没有死只是换了名字叫杰夫。
勉强称之为科幻片，却是一部实实在在的公路片，没有意味深长的自我救赎，有的是薪火相传的真情实感，倒也没有期待气势磅礴的氛围或者大刀阔斧的场面，总体观感依然太过稀薄。
偶尔看一下这种 真的有种久违的舒服感
Dear Jeff, 那些我还没能教给你的东西，Goodyear会代替我教给你的，金门大桥也会教给你的。
3.6分。
如果这是一个机器人的口述历史，然后镜头切到未来的当下。会上一个档次吧。
看多了人与人的感情之后
其实有点无聊，机器人和狗狗还是可爱的，最可爱的是杜伊可惜就它没了
故事中规中矩没有什么亮点，主角那种遗世之风简直社恐，人类交棒给机器人的隐喻也很明显。亮点是汤姆汉克斯的影帝级表演还是百尺竿头更上了一步，令人叹为观止
一个老头。一条狗。一个机器人。末日世界生存大挑战。看得有点窒息。
7/10.
当一朵花一只蝴蝶成为奇迹一般的出现时，畅快呼吸享受日光浴变成了恩赐福祉时，🤖成为了最完美的存在！
Dear Jeff, 那些我还没能教给你的东西，Goodyear会代替我教给你的，金门大桥也会教给你的。
故事行进至最后五分钟才是高潮和感人部分。一个机器人和一条狗的概念很新颖。被机器人感动到，被狗感动到（狗狗真会演戏）感动回归到本质依然是人的情感。所以，有一天世界末日，人类消亡，天空没留下痕迹，鸟却已飞过。如果我们全不在了，那些我们经历过的故事依然会被流传下去……汤姆汉克斯在里面再一次演出了人类最后的孤独。
15分钟的东西拍了115分钟。杰夫造型可人儿。
温情的末世小品，忽略掉微微突兀的加州情怀（？），都很好。
人与人之间的不信任与敌意恐怕是比世界末日还要来的恐怖 善待比自己弱小的生命 是生命基本的感动
主题就是“爱·死·机”，加上“芬奇”二字，真有看美剧的幻觉。与美剧观感更相似的原因是，片子的视野牢牢地限定在前十分钟，不再有变化，绝不会因为新增加的一些小线索而扩展自己的格局，导致片子过于可控，没啥野心。一切元素皆有模板，既不会失误，也不会留下印记。
15分钟的东西拍了115分钟。杰夫造型可人儿。
好温情啊，一人一狗一机器人。我想知道那个房子里的陷井指的是什么
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
