Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
除了两场压轴大戏，其他时候都挺省钱的，开片那段甚至绿幕的痕迹极其严重。说它多难看倒是没多难看，只是错在过时，所有的制作都是好莱坞流水线上常规水平，然后用以运作一个上个世纪夺宝奇兵式的剧本。However, 今年不是1992，今年是2022.
其实挺喜欢这种冒险题材的，类似的有《夺宝奇兵》系列。因南海九段线问题在越、菲两国禁播，这可以说是美国利用有些电影向境外输出世界观和改造意识形态的典型案例了，正是禁播后产生的舆论，会产生影响、会传播，传着传着就变味儿了。这是软实力，说白了，文化历史、影视娱乐、文艺书籍算个JB，照样给你玩成政治
有点烂，但又说不好哪里烂。。。感觉蜘蛛侠有点误入了，但整体完成度又没啥问题，大概就是平庸吧，没什么惊喜
我个人非常喜欢神海这个IP，最高难度通关4部曲➕一部外传了，也算是个小粉丝。
第一部电影改编口碑人气最高的《神海4》，是挑战也是捷径，戴上游戏粉丝滤镜看马克沃伯格的苏利文还好，荷兰弟就有点太单薄了，理解索尼想要在他身上押宝，可是必然是要付出接近10年配不上007的代价。按照观众的角度看，就是一个普普通通夺宝片，第二幕巴塞罗那简直尬到要死，开头结尾两场动作戏勉强够看，但归根结底放在网飞也毫不核突的水平。
不错，好久没看到这样的夺宝片了，推进很流畅，当然细节不用细想，硬伤还是有，道具设计也比较敷衍，但好在各种特效与动作设计到位，最后的高潮戏还打出了古代海战的感觉，赞！荷兰弟湿身N次，一个劲卖肉，但也包揽了精彩的动作戏，但演过超英有利有弊，有的名气和片约，但不管怎么看还是小蜘蛛在那里蹦蹦跳跳。马克未老先衰，打了最彻底的酱油，女主扮相不太好看，和荷兰弟的感情线也没展开。总体好评，推荐！
官方给的糖，就算它满满的玻璃渣我也爱！CP党就是这么杯微
仿佛又回到了好莱坞黄金年代，两个白人帅哥是主角，黑人女也可以当反派，ZZZQ都滚蛋，剧情虽然扯淡但好看啊！
画面崩成这样还有人看吗？真的是绝绝子了，一颗星都不想打，别看，会变得不幸
整体大片该有的元素都有，摄影运镜全程也相对流畅，节奏把控基本在线无冗长感。可惜剧本还差点意思，剧情稍一推敲全是Bug难以自圆其说。反派安东尼班德拉斯纯打酱油的，完全没存在感。荷兰弟老师这气质身材也不太符合原著设定，演蜘蛛侠还行，德雷克就算了吧。
星全给原作 话说原作就是电影叙事 全程下来的体验不是2个小时的电影能比拟的 电影本身只能是站在巨人的肩膀上没蹦多高
高空踩箱跑酷和飞机吊大船，这两场动作戏很过瘾。
最近刷荷兰弟电影比较多，这种寻宝类的电影永远让人欲罢不能~
没啥尿点但也不出彩。游戏的故事情节大概好一百倍。这种现代寻宝记题材，拍成电影，细节方面也总会有硬伤。最重要的是，荷兰弟完全不是我心中的那个Nathan Drake啊。游戏中Nathan绝对是Treasure Island Media这一挂的，但是荷兰弟是Sean Cody这一挂的。（是的，荷兰弟裸了），最后，照例剧透：Chloe其实是被坏蛋雇佣的，寻宝地点藏在Sam的明信片里，Sully为了救Nathan放弃了宝藏，彩蛋是Sam其实没死被关在监狱里。
如无意外应该是Ruben Fleischer最高作？
我预期管理做得好，没任何期待的情况下观看此片，就，还行吧。热热闹闹，别带脑子，一般水平的爆米花。但就，荷兰弟真的不太适合演德雷克。
就是摆明了大家搞钱。掉书袋还不如古董局中局，结尾大战还有些亮眼
双船撞击与空中行李箱 是熟悉电影的再创造，探墓过程倒是还行，属于类型基本完成，但都不太利索的典型。你倒是解释一下为什么苏利文良心发现啊，搞的好像他是主角一样
看完之后感觉也不是那么差，但是对续集也不是那么期待
已经对任何动作片都无动于衷了，为汤荷兰打个四星
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
