Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
网大的水准，就是皮特都弄不到一个好的动作指导
全场最佳：”I’m a woman, I’m can’t mansplain anything to you.” “ I’m a feminist, I think women can do anything men can.” 当然啦，以及Tatum的屁股
能看到这里的都不是靠推荐来的 我现在觉得哈登就是搞笑男 比女的还作 每次他发疯我就想笑 9月第4部 等 不看剧情 帅哥美女恋爱我可以看100部✊
没怎么看过印尼的片子，故事还行，也有一些现实意义，也还不错。
男主真的帥 可是第三部位真的狗血了 不孕 出生的秘密都開始了 還以為拍韓劇呢😂😂
如果是这个脱衣服的频率的话，建议服化道老师就别给男主准备上衣了哈
情节、对话、开啪之尴尬，通篇只有戴套安全是个值得科普的点，懂了是部性科普篇。但是大家不要学啪完吵架，泳池开啪也不要，打咩。我就为男主颜值打个分吧。
对于男生来说，除了爱情至上的人是不允许有瑕疵的。幼稚，在乎，爱生气，占有欲，报复欲都是很强的不成熟的表现。
網飛的亞洲在地生產，印尼的宗教文化之於族群性別的隱性影響被「有錢能使鬼推磨」的權勢壓迫沖淡了
这剧情深情中带着一些脑残 越到后面越离谱 而且很规矩的是赫汀每次都记着带T 除了最后一次 好像是个注意安全的教科书
原来是家庭伦理连续剧 感觉故事挺多的 线也很多 为啥不直接拍成电视剧 下一部什么时候来啊
最后几分钟笑死人了……我以为我在看二十年前的狗血韩剧哈哈哈哈哈哈。男主还是第一部最好看，第三部已经略油，女主也是看起来逐渐发福显老。
一下午看了三部，男主的人设真的很和我口味！！！虽然剧情很弱智，但并不影响我欣赏帅哥美女。男主为什么总穿黑色的衣服
谈啥剧情哦，有Hero的颜值，就够撑完90分钟！有时候动脑子的看多了，看到纯颜值的无脑片，也香的呀！Btw，比II好！
剧情狗血起来了
本来以为是夺宝奇兵那类动作冒险片，其实更多属于冒险喜剧吧，再加点爱情元素。皮特算是小惊喜，啊，还有那谁的屁股。
这部…情绪化的男主，确实是帅的。在是否去西雅图的抉择上我深刻地感受到了，异地有时候真的算一种不错的选择，
苏尔酒醉之后，因第二天被发现自己的喝酒自拍而丧失了奖学金的资格，愤而需找出真相的历程…最后果然还是那个有权有势的…
我是来看偶像剧的，不是家庭伦理剧？？？
结局依旧稳定发挥，狗血得令人心疼👍🏻👍🏻
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
