A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
如何尝试以糊弄的方式来精准的满足每个与会者的小算盘。何以为疯狂的抽象罪恶来配套最具体的残忍行动。尤以对比当下的防溢战略到战术，即使他们比起德国制造的精准和逻辑相去甚远，但是东施效颦的影子却异常清晰。
妈呀花泽香菜快把我叫聋了。同志们来看不怂包的淀真嗣用纯爱拯救世界。
作为电影来说不如英版的更具有观赏性，德国人来拍哪敢有什么发挥的空间
怎么才能知道自己可以呢？在经过了那么多的困难、打击之后，怎么才能知道自己的梦想会成真呢，没人知道，但是坚持到最后的人，他更值得去得到吧。和朋友在餐厅那番谈话，其实觉得是最有触动的，到了一个年纪的人，他总要决定，自己是曾经端过餐盘的作家，还是只是一个有着爱好和梦想的服务员。
别墅、包装的公文式语言、讨论百万人命运时的冷静，不知现在是否也是如此呢？
最近日本动画导演脑子里是不是连“曝光”和“景深”的基本概念都没了，“轴线”也是用不上的过时处理品了。哎呀。
天啊好平庸，林漫威真的不会导电影，越是想把电影做成电影化，那些元素就越是和歌舞不搭
这种会议片可以拍成一个系列，延绵至今。感谢昆仑德语字幕组高质翻译。
15个冷静的杀手开了一个会议决定了600万人的姓名，这段历史该被铭记！
相对没那么跌宕起伏的故事，换来的是可以全身心投入到传记所展示的对音乐、对生活毫无保留的热忱中去。音乐很好听，融合得很好，也没有喧宾夺主。有关susan的歌曲绝佳。
理智，有条不紊，精简会议，与“犹太人清除计划”的议题的反差，就足够具备戏剧效果，然而它是基于真实结果的推因想象，不寒而栗更加一层
前传啊！加上剧一块都还是太短了完全看不过瘾怎么办
对历史的严肃还原，虽然是会议，但并不枯燥。长篇的对白也更需要演员的演技。
一件我们正在经历的事情
1942年1月20日，希姆莱和海德里希组织发起万湖会议，15名纳粹和帝国高官参加，讨论和协调解决“犹太人问题”。但万湖会议实际上并不是决定欧洲犹太人命运的会议，时间向前追溯一年半，戈林便已授权海德里希处置德国势力范围内的犹太人，其时已有将近100万犹太人遇害。会议大约开了两小时，电影1小时45分钟，除了会前人员陆续到齐、会中短暂茶歇和简餐，全程会议。个人觉得拍得并不好，非常考验观众的耐受力，太冗长。艾希曼给海德里希准备的欧洲犹太人清单，甚至囊括了当时德国尚未占领的瑞士、芬兰、英国。总人数1,100万至1,200万。万湖会议所起到的最重要作用是协调了纳粹的种族灭绝行动，把所有部门所有人都拉了进来。但如果认为万湖会议确定了“最终解决方案”，那是一个相当大的误解。
跟英版的一群莎剧戏骨，英式幽默，戏剧高浓不同的是，德国这一版的表演非常冰冷地做出决策：如何让这场大屠杀执行起来更人道？注意，是德国人更人道地执行，而不是人道地对待犹太人，非常精准地还原了史实。
一个小细节，唯一差点冒头的良心来自一个年纪比较大的官员，充满干劲的年轻人总是冲在残忍第一线，就挺真实的。
十几个人拍拍桌子就决定了600万犹太人的生死！看的太压抑。
作为电影来说不如英版的更具有观赏性，德国人来拍哪敢有什么发挥的空间
几乎以纪录片的形式呈现了那场惨无人道的邪恶会议，让后人看到纳粹对犹太人种族灭绝背后的故事。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
