Devon Ke Dev...Mahadev is a Hindu spiritual television drama series which airs on Life OK channel. It premiered on 18 December, 2011 and showcases the story of Lord Shiva, also called as Mahadev.
The drama is inspired by the works of Devdutt Pattanaik. The story has been researched from Bodhisattva and has been penned up by Mihir Bhuta.
Devon Ke Dev...Mahadev is the story of the Hindu God Shiva, also called as Mahadev. The show portrays his journey from a hermit to a house holder. In the show Shiva takes many incarnations and many incidents take place. However, this plot mentions only the major events.
The story starts with the tale of Shiva's marriage with Sati. Sati who is the daughter of Prajapati Daksha, a staunch Vishnu devotee, is drawn towards Shiva against the wishes of her father. She finally marries Shiva, but soon dies by self-immolation when her husband is insulted at the yajna of Daksha. The grief-striken Shiva produces Virabhadra, who slays Daksha, however he restores Daksha's life after beseeching of Daksha's wife. A distraught Shiva leaves with burnt corpse of Sati and wanders the universe. Vishnu severs the body into pieces, shattering them on earth. Shiva transforms the pieces into Shakti Peethas, embodiments of the power of the Goddess Adi Shakti.
Sati is reborn as Parvati, the daughter of Himavan, king of the Himalayas and Mainavati. She is also the sister of the river-goddess, Ganga. Parvati is raised in the hermitage of the Shiva devotee sage Dadhichi, who teaches her devotion to Shiva. Parvati grows up and like Sati, is captivated by Shiva. She slowly remembers her past life, then wins Shiva by her austerities leading to their marriage.
Shiva and Parvati give birth to Kartikeya, who slays the demon Tarakasura and his brothers. Kartikeya is also nominated for the throne of the King of Devas but Shiva asks Indra to continue as the king. After this Kartikeya is sent to the Dakshin (south) where he is cared by Meenakshi and here he slays the demon (asura), Tripath with her help. The story goes on with the tale of the destruction of Tripura, belonging to the revengeful sons of Tarakasura, who were earlier given boons by Shiva. And just before the destruction of the Tripura, Shiva and Parvati's daughter, Ashoksundari is born.
After the destruction of Tripura, except Lord Indra (the King of Devas) everyone congratulate Shiva for destructing Tripura and also for being the father of Ashokasundari. Rishi Durvasa gives him a special garland, which Shiva gave Narada as prasadam. When given Lord Indra accepts the garland placing it on the trunk of his elephant, Airavata to proof that he is egoistic throws it. This enrages the sage and he curses Indra and evryone to be bereft of all wealth and fortune. Soon later to take revenge on the destruction of Tripura, King Bali attacks heaven and in attempt to steal Amrita (nectar of immortality). But it falls into the Ocean of milk. To get the Amrit back Devas join hands with Asuras to churn the ocean for the Amrita and to share it among them.
The churning of the ocean, known as Samudra Manthan is an elaborate process. In the process the Devas disadvantage the Asuras in many ways. Despite this, they churn the ocean. In the process Lord Vishnu also takes his second incarnation of a turtle, Kurma.
The process releases a number of things from the ocean. One product is the lethal poison known as Halahala. This could contaminate the ocean and destroy all of creation. To save everyone Lord Shiva inhales the poison in an act of self-sacrifice but Parvati rescues him by pressing his neck to stop the poison from spreading. As a result, the color of Lord Shiva's neck turns blue. During the churning many things are obtained from the ocean which includes Lakshmi, the Goddess of fortune and wealth, who is the eternal consort of Vishnu. Thus, everyone gets their wealth and fortune back. Later Vishnu takes the Amrita secretly from the Asuras and distributes it among the Devas.
The story takes some years leap after which it is shown that Kartikeya has been removed from the post of Senapati(head of the army), which pleases Indra and for the first time after so many years, a grown-up Ashoksundari meets Kartikeya. Kartikeya also meets his parents. He enlightens Ashoksundari about meditation and she inspired by it so much that she renounces her life to meditate, which disturbs Parvati.
Looking at the ill happening of the world, of how Ahalya is seduced by Indra, Mahadev come indside. Even after Mahadev tells that he is his father and many other gods tried to tell him, he still refuses. Mahadev got angry and cut Vinayak's head.
平权述求太直白，蜂巢皮肤受不了，几个杀戮镜头的处理挺喜欢，从窗外拉远景的那个特别有感觉，小化妆镜反射那个也不错。。话说这年轻黑人女导演凭这部就被漫威选中导惊奇队长2啦？。。
49 恐怖片不恐怖 想借此来讨论社会问题也并没有多好的效果 反而形成了司马昭之心路人皆知的模样 看得我尴尬到脚趾抓地 整部影片不三不四的像个笑话 作为周末爆米花电影都无聊到让人昏昏欲睡的程度
细看画面，数次察觉镜头向面孔推近或打特写，又看见镜头拉远框柱社区——这是图像深植文本的痕迹：它呈现那些发出诉求的人，还描绘带着社会遗症的环境。影像处理像文本一样呼唤，故事中这片区域供给叙事力量，而先后出现的面孔就是苦痛的直接参照，当然不必躲藏，因为不光残杀是血淋淋的，受过苦痛的男主和糖果人本人也是血淋淋的。
好好讲一个带有悲剧色彩的都市传说不好么？试图加太多元素进入，反而搞得奇奇怪怪…
这导演所有片子就围着种族歧视这个框使劲装东西，看多了真没意思，虽然片子继承了首版糖果人的诸多设定还有结尾的惊喜彩蛋，但是这片子一点都不恐怖，从头到尾就每一个小细节小故事都透露着对白人歧视黑人肢解黑人文化的控诉，但说句政治不正确的话如果这个国家的文化价值观是以黑人为尊的话，那离向海地靠拢也就不远了。说完题外话，这部新作相比以往几版的糖果人恐怖感真的不行，糖果人系列比较标志性的恐怖血浆跟密集恐惧表现得都不行，很明显可以看出导演为了讲故事刻意没有渲染这些镜头，血浆杀戮戏没有就算了，但是以蜜蜂群做密集恐惧是小时候看老版留下的最深刻印象，这个经典元素都没有重现，对本片非常非常失望。
要恐怖不恐怖，要深刻不深刻，一篓子导演的私货，看个寂寞。
恐怖片血浆片想拍就好好拍，没必要整这么多zz隐喻，搞得很复杂，很沉重，所以这就是为什么黑人一直没法提升自己的地位，他们想到的摆脱白人统治的方法就是暴力屠杀的恶灵，把candyman拍的有些正义就很可怕。不过电影的一些血浆还是很不错的，最后蜜蜂环绕的感觉也很棒。
emmmmm像是被某个中年男教授（是否失意不确定）肯定过，就鸡血创作的大学毕设（能不能被评优要看同行愿不愿意衬托）
平权述求太直白，蜂巢皮肤受不了，几个杀戮镜头的处理挺喜欢，从窗外拉远景的那个特别有感觉，小化妆镜反射那个也不错。。话说这年轻黑人女导演凭这部就被漫威选中导惊奇队长2啦？。。
Anthony 小小的身影在高楼大厦和贫民窟间穿梭的画面给我留下了深刻印象，而故事最后往宿命论上靠则削弱了”一个人背后站着一个群体“的历史感，反而像阴魂不散的幽灵寻找替身的寻常路数。最后的皮影戏升华全片，倒是不小的惊喜。以及，看到豆瓣职员表才意识到，原来电影不是乔丹·皮尔导演的。（囧）
2.5感觉讲得有点凌乱，不过镜子的运用和摄影构图还挺讲究的。这也是一部政治隐喻的恐怖片。
男主是第一部被女主救的男孩（被糖果人选中的继承人），最后被来到的警察杀了，女主唤出糖果人解决了警察们
对比《绝命镇》、《我们》，《糖果人》爽快的复仇回馈背后，是难以掩饰的戾气和悲凉。电影整体比起理智的反思、更像是有指向性的威慑，白人犯贱必作死，没有一钩子解决不了的问题，如果有、那就两钩子。算不上谜题的谜题让这部片成为一种近似邪典和民族控诉，仿佛在警告所有白人：把我们逼疯了，可不知道会做出什么事来。
黑人电影总是逃不出种族这个议题，白人社会给他们烙上的无法磨灭的伤口
恕我段位不够，欣赏不来…有几个吓人的点和笑点还凑合。劝大家在看这部之前先去补习一下1992年版本，这部更像是个续集。
'They'll never know what you sacrificed for them' from Wandavision. Compare to being a 1992 Candyman remake or sequel, it's more of a woke version of Velvet Buzzsaw. 1/10. UNWATCHABLE.
不看解读根本不知道讲啥，那些评论说是种族问题，是怎么看出来的？
D+ / 太急切地想要靠近乔丹·皮尔式的黑人政治隐喻恐怖类型片，但对于剧本的创意还欠打磨，反倒是隐喻过于急切，四人中亚裔感觉到危险率先跑掉的情节本身就是没有什么逻辑的生硬隐喻，更何况本来就是老版糖果人的续作。镜子的运用、摄像机视点的选择有有意思的地方，但太少。
看之前先看了老版的介绍。值得一提的，是这一版可以当作老版的延续，镜头构图有刻意工整的压迫感。镜像应用非常切合故事内涵，但除了视觉和恐怖设计，文本也从来没有融在其中。种族议题果然敏感，但凡处碰的电影，味道从不会照顾双方，这一部将糖果人变成杀害白色人种的工具象征，观者的感受真是受尽压迫啊。
影片的视觉风格基本延续了乔丹·皮尔现代恐怖片的表现形式，虽然拒心理恐惧的呈现差口气，但整体仍然是新鲜刺激的，不过这结局有点让人齿寒，继续讲述以暴制暴显得粗暴又无奈。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
