Middle class student Bob Letellier enters a new world when he meets Alain, a free-thinking rebel who, along with his group of young Parisians, has opted for a life of instant gratification instead of work and commitment. At a party, Bob meets a young woman, Mic, who appears to be just as carefree and cynical as Alain. Mic's only dream is to own a luxury car, and with Bob's help, she manages to find the money to but it. Mic's friend Clo discovers she is pregnant and, not knowing who the father is, she asks Bob to marry her. When they next meet at a party, Bob and Mic deny that they have any feelings for one another - a declaration that soon leads to tragedy...
Marcel Carné is widely regarded as one of the standard bearers of French quality cinema of the 1930s and 1940s, responsible for such masterpieces as Quai des brumes (1938) and Les Enfants du Paradis (1945). How ironic then that, in 1958, towards the end of his film-making career, he should make a film which dared to portray the attitudes and behaviour of the 1950s youth, in a way that effectively captures the mood and sentiment of the time.
Les Tricheurs was a hugely controversial film, not least because of its blatant depiction of adolescent free-love, and was even banned in some regions of France. It also received some intensely unfavourable reviews, most notably from the young hotheads on the Cahiers du cinéma such as François Truffaut who cited this film as a prime example of the decline of French cinema into mediocrity. In spite of all this negative press, the film proved to be an astonishing commercial success, attracting five million cinema-goers, and was awarded the Grand Prix du Cinéma français in 1958.
Whilst Les Tricheurs is not as flawless as Carné's earlier masterpieces, it is nonetheless a significant work, having the power to both shock and move its audience, whilst having great entertainment value. It evokes the mood of its time in a way that few French films of this period did, depicting young people as pleasure-seeking rebels, rejecting the austerity and discipline of the previous generation whilst pursuing a life without cares, responsibilities or love. Similarities with James Dean's films of the 1950s (most notably Rebel without a Cause) are apparent, although Carné's treatment of young people is far more abstract - in his film they merely symbolise a world that has lost its way, more or less victims of post-war prosperity. Although the young people in Les Tricheurs lack the authenticity to be totally credible, the film does make an important, and indeed quite disturbing point, about where the permissive society may be heading.
Much of the pleasure of the film is in the performances from its four lead actors, Jacques Charrier, Pascale Petit, Laurent Terzieff and Andréa Parisy, although only Terzieff is really convincing in his role. Marcel Carné originally considered Alain Delon and Jean-Paul Belmondo for the parts of Bob and Alain respectively, before opting for Charrier and Terzieff. As a consolation, Carné offered Belmondo a smaller part in the film - alas too small for the actor to be noticed by the public. Belmondo's breakthrough had to wait until the following year when he starred in Jean-Luc Godard's revolutionary A bout de souffle, a film which offers a very different perspective of the youth generation.
比《阳光普照》崩得还快，比《内特拉姆》还要想当然还糟糕。充斥着“嘿我来告诉你们观众一个隐喻你猜接下来是不是依然是这个隐喻？”的聪明劲。真正的“人性反转＋生活体悟＋台式苦情”短视频拼贴。爆笑程度＞99%春晚小品。“我在这边看你表演已经忍不下去”（当然不是贾静雯的问题，是钟孟宏的问题）。
看到安娜自己动手引胎，第一次堕胎，第二次手术的场面，脊背发凉，女人在身体的选择上为何要听从那些没有长子宫的人！
helpless，整个电影都揪着心，疼痛通过屏幕传导，必须捍卫堕胎权
怀孕是女性绝症，孕育的背后还有着性羞耻这一顽疾。其中一些画面看得太痛了，如芒在背。我今天还在思考讲女孩堕胎的这些电影也会反映出时代和政治，想了半天突然反应过来，堕胎就是政治。
4.5.电影传递了超越肉身的“身体疼痛”，这样的“疼痛”是我们发现几十年后的今天女性依然不能对自己的身体有自主权，是我们发现这样的剥削与压迫依然是the happening reality，是那些抗争与互助下女性无法回避的关于牺牲与选择的collective memory.将关于子宫与孕育的谎言在父权制的面前打破，告诉你们真正血淋淋的关于身体政治的一切。那么，那些依然希望囚禁并掌握子宫的男人，你们准备好面对关于生存与现实的拷问了么？
让我想起《观音山》。对人类来说，重建比面对失序更困难，需要缝合，需要舍弃，需要从头再来。真正的悲剧始于大楼摘下蓝色“口罩”之后，经过创伤，重新走进阳光里，安详又死寂，我们都回不去了，即使那是一条末路，也被修改了轨道，进入另一个平行宇宙。
简单的题材，全篇就围绕着一个事，跟拍风格下的情绪展现：不敢相信、惶恐、接受、尝试、绝望、最后一搏、重生。严苛政策之下，连生命都可以放弃的人们在追求什么？结尾部分的不适感甚至超过了《钛》，因为太过写实。
她从身体的角度尝试种种方式
很难不与《四月三周两天》对比，这部更温和、更坚毅、更多善意、更多女性间的互助。那句“这是只攻击女人的绝症，无差别地把所有人变成家庭主妇“是对制度对社会的质询，振聋发聩。任何关于abortion的电影都是痛的，看的时候让人坐立难安的痛，《四月》《从不很少有时总是》《女人韵事》甚至只作为支线的《烧女图》都会带来这样共通的感受。记住这种痛，要发声、要反抗，拒绝沉默。
法国的“裹小脚”时代，只是不管哪个地域哪个国度的封建时期，受迫害最深的，永远是女性。镜头尺度挺大，疼痛感强烈，一部女性专属的恐怖电影。
8.5/10
帮助，这就是我想要的
4.5不难理解，想想片中的男人都做了什么，简单而深刻，片名具有意义。国外对题材探索的脚步已经甩我们好几条街，而我们还沉浸在虚构爱情或是挥舞励志正能量的大旗…
去年欧洲三大最高奖之中，我最喜欢威尼斯的这部《正发生》，太棒了！全程手持摄影似在模拟女主的情绪，让我看不到叙事作为固态存在于影像中，极佳的女性主义电影。
年代不是很清晰，1.33:1的画幅是想制造一种年代感吧，没有起到什么作用，服化上也没太清楚，但这个画幅却很好地发挥了视听的力量，内外调度，演员表演看起来都很自然协调。
电影色调很好看，一些镜头下的人物近摄很美，故事情节很简单，聚焦于女性背负人权的重压，无奈的煎熬，只有拼死一搏，杀出血路。
私人以为，钟孟宏的作品一直被过誉。他的电影始终给我一种无病呻吟的感觉，这次依然是这样，剧本本身就一般，台词也很做作。生活很多时候真的不是都像瀑布一样一泻千里的，瀑布的最下端永远都是平静的湖水或广袤的海洋，拜托不要只看到陡峭的人生，也不要一味为赋新词强说愁。
开头以贾静雯焦虑、失序、诡异的主观臆想起始勾画，随后就在母女俩正反打的叙事角度中迷失，紊乱、拖沓、乏味。
想起 #从不，很少，有时，总是，异曲同工之处，刚好遇上美国取消了执行50年的堕胎权，这片还要是在说60年代的，时代一直没进步不禁让人唏嘘
观感很复杂，确实没有和疫情非绑在一起不可的关联，但却又像是不得不在疫情时才能get到的电影。很多东西都不断把人与人之间的界限模糊消去，但却也鲜有人真正去认识一个人，而在这种危险的亲密关系里，盼望“雨”将对方打醒的同时，却又不再盼望“雨”消散，于是“雨”积压泄落，结局亦未必是天晴。场置美术某种意义上弥补了本子里不够细腻的东西，每个场景的细节都做得又足又厉害。王净表现得挺好，虽然也有角色本身的加成吧。3.5归4，个人而言比《阳普》更加喜欢这部。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
