Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
不要试图用癌症情节的天然悲情性来掩盖前面所有一切尴尬和奇葩的三观。这是十元女士的笑最让我厌恶的一次。没看过原著，在想这也能成为畅销书岛国人是有多二次元了呢……
如果这部电影换成是国产剧，估计肯定是4分左右的评分。
甜圭眼镜真好看
人物设定实在是太空洞了，故事也完全是在走过场，块状叙事虚得一塌糊涂，还有那让人发怵的营业笑容和美人鱼泡沫般的演技……可不争气的我总还是会为有遗憾的亲情动容，可恶，就会用这么点东西拿捏观众。
这片中国没法翻拍，因为警方第一时间就会关闭酒店加上全员脸部识别，哪里需要店员冒着生命危险嘛，哪里拍出酒店和警方对峙嘛。
跟对象一起看的 画面不戳 前半段太混乱了 而且动机确实是常人无法理解
食之无味弃之可惜/如果不是木村和长泽雅美估计根本不会点开/bug多到说不完啊…..
很可惜，十元这个关键人物的演技撑不起来。她在《天国餐厅》+《人生最棒的礼物》两种表演路数间横跳，还夹杂着一点话剧表演的肢体，让我这个忠粉有一种很丢脸的尴尬。具体到故事，时间线还是带来了那么一点趣味，但也就是如此了。中国人很难理解，对这日式故事的评价到底应该是“感动”还是“奇葩”。
推理和剧情的严密性没了，满篇都只能感受到酒店理念，续作好像都会翻车
很抱歉咩酱，我又一次白嫖了电影并给了较低的评价。我觉得这部电影的价值观念有问题，十元女士演妈妈也有不少缺陷，我感觉电影的内核非常苍白，看得我毫无波澜，自然也没有一些观众所说的感动到流泪，某种程度上真的比地狱的花园那种无厘头的武打片还差。就算有婚纱咩酱也拯救不了，我勉勉强强给三星。还是那句话，如果不是咩酱参演，很可能都不会看。
试图合理化或者给自以为的父母疼爱精神找到借口。其实是另一种自私观念的体现。大段的煽情实在是应该节制一些。
想做母亲的妈妈和偷来的孩子的故事，优子真是一个幸福的孩子，所有的妈妈和爸爸都非常非常的爱她，这是一个美丽的童话故事
瀨尾老師和導演一起出來跟市井昌秀挨打吧。這種家庭片真的沒興趣你打亂時間順序搞插敘。搞來搞去問題又在於女人得了大病生不了孩子就活不下去了似的，好像生而為女人除了生兒育女沒有別的使命志願，甚至還絕症梗糊觀眾一臉瀨尾老師您怕不是有什麼大病。優子輾轉在幾個家庭之間，沒有血緣卻有愛的情節，因為插敘帶來的割裂毫無感染力。太浪費小咩了，十元倒是還可以，田中圭也合適爸爸這個角色，岡田健史太硬氣了，早瀨開頭那個瘋癲彈琴浮誇了，和老師逛街也沒解釋清楚。//這部宣傳力度太大了，甚至想感嘆宣發財力雄厚。不知道正片怎麼樣，好看的話又要喊市井昌秀出來挨打。
是制作方非常清晰知晓会拥有精准投放目标群的TVC广告，正因为相较而言它的观众太脱节了，以至于这里手起刀落剪出的丝滑质感甚至带着某种不需要犹豫和深究的自信。再靠近一步的话，成片洒落的粉橘松绿之间，十元不断登场的人设和盛装造型甚至可以异化成为某种随心所欲的高调捣乱。...不过还是最近太痛心疾苦了，已经失去了相信现实的能力，mei酱的「毕业落泪弹奏」和「心动时分无望的手心贴手心」竟然成了这虚假melon泡沫里唯一沉进心里的好东西。
剧情就真的一头问号，但是十元和4y好美啊！
卡司太豪华了，美国来的人倒是猜到了真实身份，凶手前面烟雾弹太多没猜到。总得来说比第一部好看点，虽然都是故弄玄虚。
真无法理解这样的女人。渣女总会遇到好男人，不然就没戏了。
晕 剧情很奇怪 但是哭死我了😭😭😭 我好喜欢十元这个角色啊 另：未婚夫存在感太低了完全工具人
改太多了，但是全程有永野芽郁看，倒也称不上难看。
跟前作一样看困了，没有长泽雅美应该不会看它吧
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
